Recent content by selfsimilar

So in a sense because of the complicated nature of these measurements I give TI the benefit of the doubt until I understand these experiments better.

I have already discussed this issue. While it does seem to be consistent but the explanation makes it borderline since it does not agree on what exactly is been measured which should be eigenvalues as in conventional theory. That is why I brought up more information about what the experiments...

This has added additional uncertainty in my understanding:smile: https://www.google.com/search?q=Quantum+projection+noise&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#fpstate=ive&vld=cid:08491694,vid:gmbkokgR28Y,st:40

I have heard of many attempts to derive the Born rule but only in the context of the origin of eigenvalue in QM which is not controversial, but TI's case is a quite different take. Moreover, It is quite surprising that after 100 years of studying the subject in many sophisticated research...

Is this propensity different from q-expectation.

While there is no higher committee to decide. I personally only care for what makes sense to me taking into consideration the consensus, I just expect for people to put forth arguments like your demotion of Born rule which is looked upon as a postulate of QM ( a lot more than less). To my mind...

Thanks. Yes the way I wrote "atom" created confusion, I meant another atom. Just thought will be understood by the context. The word keen was about if TI/UQM would be considered an interpretation or something else.

In some sense yes , since eigenvalues are used but not as "standard" QM since measurement yields so called Q-expectation. I am not too keen on word characterization but it is surprising because in physical sciences we like to be very clear in what(how) we are examining . Though it is...

Yes, objective collapse theories similar to GRW by modifying Schrodinger equation to explain the collapse without measurement but you need high precision equipment not available yet. https://www.math.uni-tuebingen.de/de/forschung/maphy/personen/roderichtumulka/talks/oxford2021.pdf edit: from...

Can you analyze this question in your framework "Lets say this hydrogen atom which is in a superposition (in energy or spin for example) interacts with other atoms, does it affect them with the expectation value or one of it eigenvalues chosen randomly."

I am not sure about the rule for ai posting but its my understanding also "do all interpretation lead to the same experimental results In principle, true interpretations use the exact same mathematical equations and therefore must lead to identical experimental results. If two frameworks made...

My understanding is that QM interpretations should give the same results in experiments. It seems as if you are taking about a "different" theory and not an interpretation. I guess I am missing something.

What is the status (what does it mean) of psi in Schrödinger equation when applicable.

The post was really intended for RUTA saying that his system does not seem to add too much to understand the conceptual problems of QM.

sorry, I meant like the position of the electron in Hydrogen atom, for example.