Recent content by selfsimilar

The post was really intended for RUTA saying that his system does not seem to add too much to understand the conceptual problems of QM.

sorry, I meant like the position of the electron in Hydrogen atom, for example.

So in what sense this tells us where the electron was before measurement, among other properties.

Barandes in one of his papers says(https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.16935) "plausibly resolves the measurement problem, and deflates various exotic claims about superposition, interference, and entanglement" My question is, he talked about these subjects but did not elaborate on superposition. So...

What is the mechanism for this. otherwise it is trivial, is it not. What I mean is that there is no actual formula for the two particle interaction i.e. Schrodinger equation is not modified.

I agree. I am familiar with the general concept.

certainly not, not even general relativity. QFT particle interaction I have some sympathy for, like the "virtual particle" and intuitive concept of momentum. But QM and interpretations are really awkward, that is why there is so much talk about them, just seems something missing. I am hoping...

in the sense of evolution . But not the particle position. Otherwise we would not have this discussion. particle position is still determined by the magical guiding wave which amounts to a postulate but does not give clear mechanism how particles affect each other.

That was my complaint. Not only that, but non of the interpretations show any thing remotely as to the deterministic mechanism for entanglement.

To my knowledge that is why general relativity was invented and it says gravity is not instantaneous.

But aren't QM interpretations which are suppose to be deterministic claim to explain QM.

Going through QM interpretations theories I have a hard time understanding how entanglements fit in these theories. How can a deterministic theory explain instantaneous effects billions( or maybe trillions) of light years away. Can somebody clarify the issue for me?

I think the field is a mathematical entity. The DE Broglie matter wave is defined by a real number. The wave function is generally an imaginary number. I have seen some "relation" but it is not clear.

What is it mean for "the particle departs", where does it go physically.

Demystifier what do you think of this paper. Have they reached any results https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/this-simple-experiment-could-challenge-standard-quantum-theory/