Universal quantum physics

[selfsimilar]

@selfsimilar Your concerns are somewhat vague. As a starting point: Do you accept that the above approach is consistent with the predictions of textbook QM?

I have already discussed this issue. While it does seem to be consistent but the explanation makes it borderline since it does not agree on what exactly is been measured which should be eigenvalues as in conventional theory. That is why I brought up more information about what the experiments say.

Moreover, It is quite surprising that after 100 years of studying the subject in many sophisticated research institutes/universities, including Vienna (yours), the researches would be unsure that they are actually measuring eigenvalues with these sophisticated Lasers and what not. Are all these PHD students duping themselves.

edit: The caveat to above is that after reading about the experiments they don't seem to be straight forward as it seems although I don't have any real( or deep) experience with these techniques.

 

[selfsimilar]

So in a sense because of the complicated nature of these measurements I give TI the benefit of the doubt until I understand these experiments better.