Recent content by Siah

I am trying to clarify this earlier statement: "Time is that which is intermediate between moments" You say 'moments are an "attribute" of time. As I understand it you are saying that moments have a time-span. Is this correct?

I would recommend you get in touch with Bohm's thoughts on Implicate order.

Are 'moments' composed of time? If not, what are they composed of?

How can there be a "state" of nothing?

What is the difference between the 'moment' and the 'intermediate'?

Combinations of what?

When we talk about the ontological nature of something, can this not be regarded as forming a mental model? The notion/idea/concept of what reality "really is" must still be a mental construct/model. The contemplation of reality via any mental process must surely lead to a limited comprehension...