Recent content by Slyster
-
S
Undergrad Black hole smaller than a neutron star?
How about a huge black hole.. billions of solar masses.. besides having much more gravity, it it going to be the same 'size' at a much less massive black hole. Thanks.- Slyster
- Post #4
- Forum: Astronomy and Astrophysics
-
S
Undergrad Black hole smaller than a neutron star?
OK so some stars evolve into neutron stars which I assume are so small (10's of kms) because ALL empty space is removed between the atoms.. absolute highest density possible? Now.. is a black hole larger (massive and in diameter) than a neutron star and called a black hole only because the...- Slyster
- Thread
- Black hole Hole Neutron Neutron star Star
- Replies: 7
- Forum: Astronomy and Astrophysics
-
S
Undergrad Why is E=MC^2 such a neat and simple formula?
ah.. that's a good point of view.. I hadn't thought of that.- Slyster
- Post #7
- Forum: Special and General Relativity
-
S
Undergrad Why is E=MC^2 such a neat and simple formula?
Yes. But 2.018 I could live with. but exactly 2? Either metric is based on energy/mass or the other way around. seems fishy. ;)- Slyster
- Post #5
- Forum: Special and General Relativity
-
S
Undergrad Why is E=MC^2 such a neat and simple formula?
squared is pretty neat though.. why not E=MC2.01867378432783794847384 etc. Might be a silly question but it bugs me :)- Slyster
- Post #3
- Forum: Special and General Relativity
-
S
Undergrad Why is E=MC^2 such a neat and simple formula?
OK.. my question I've pondered in the past.. why is E=MC2 such a nice and clean formula.. with no corrections or " x .00003845" etc. Was metric based on the universe (physics) or is the universe somehow based on metric?- Slyster
- Thread
- E=mc^2
- Replies: 8
- Forum: Special and General Relativity