Recent content by someonewholikesstuff
-
Distinguishing Mathematical Consistency from Physical Realizability
What's wrong if i do have a homemade terminology? And I do have regular education in math and physics how can you dare say that?- someonewholikesstuff
- Post #10
- Forum: STEM Educators and Teaching
-
Distinguishing Mathematical Consistency from Physical Realizability
Hey, I actually put real time into writing that, you just probably think any type of advanced language is AI—that idea is honestly ludicrous. I’m genuinely interested in dimensional science, and I don’t just throw words together for fun.- someonewholikesstuff
- Post #6
- Forum: STEM Educators and Teaching
-
Distinguishing Mathematical Consistency from Physical Realizability
Thank you for the clarification — that helps sharpen the question. A simple example I had in mind is a purely spatial 2-D configuration (e.g., a static geometric manifold or field snapshot) which is mathematically self-consistent but does not, by itself, encode change. Introducing time as an...- someonewholikesstuff
- Post #5
- Forum: STEM Educators and Teaching
-
Distinguishing Mathematical Consistency from Physical Realizability
In many physical models, lower-dimensional manifolds are mathematically self-consistent, but dynamically incomplete unless augmented by additional parameters (for example, time for change, or external structures that allow evolution). This suggests a distinction between mathematical...- someonewholikesstuff
- Thread
- Dimensions Physics
- Replies: 11
- Forum: STEM Educators and Teaching
-
Some thoughts about self-education
Well, it really does depend. For example, if someone educates themselves on topics that require one's own opinion, it doesn't really matter. But if they were to educate themselves on subjects that have definitive answers and do not rely on perspectives, then yes—self-education does not work here.- someonewholikesstuff
- Post #28
- Forum: STEM Educators and Teaching