I think your sun signature is all over the wire nut ( with inadvisable ink :)
Reference https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/uv-light-electric-current-boom.934703/
I don't have to be there physically do I ? We can replace me with a device that just return the information back to us at Earth, don't tell nobody about it and make a lot of money. We tried to get patent on it but every time at appears that it already patented .
I think that the problem here is...
Some of the comments are from Rich the writer himself and some others are interesting and informative I didn't go through all of them( did you ? ) so maybe fifty is the right figure , ☺
http://www.theculture.org/rich/sharpblue/archives/000089.html
If we need others point of view I recommend the above link.
I'm ready for the first lesson about relativity. ( I Think ).
To use the tachyonic antitelephone, the user must aim it at the position in space occupied by the Earth in 1930. The user then must dial the telephone number a2807a and the device will transmit a beam of modulated tachyons back into time. When the beam arrives in 1930 the telephone will ring at...
2807 Ok.
It was mention as " any speed " , in order for Lorentz Transformation to play a role they have to move apart close to the speed of light, then time dilation might cause the reply to be received before... but I THINK it will work only with instantaneous info transfer .
Am I 'm even...
What Einstein had to say about this ?
I don't see any observer that will say that the reply was received before the message was send.
Math must be interesting .
What is heading away from me at any speed, got to do with it, is it just appear to be because you know (assume in this case) that FTL is not possible ?.
I can't figure it out, if the clock on M running 86.6 % the rate of the one on ISS than wouldn't it measure the time a light beam travels from ISS to it 115% faster ?
The two observers they can't agree on time , distance etc, what they can agree on ?
It is very small, still we can measure it.
Edit : ",but with gravity the distance and the speed are not changing "
Can we say that when light is blueshift at A the clock at A will run slower and when light redshift at B the clock at B will run faster than at the source?
What if M lost its...
10 sec delay cause 1.55 sec time dilation. that is 11.55 offset ?
The first wave in the 10 sec broadcast will take the same time as the last wave to reach M.
Because M is moving toward ISS it receives the transmission in higher frequency and in less time but the clock on M ticks slower in a...
Ahaha , That is the big question. you got it , that is my problem Doctor !
The man on M will he see the tv clock moving at faster rate than his own because of time dilation on M , but because the signal doesn't delay at M at all this dilation don't appear on ISS TV.
Any delay on M will affect...