Recent content by stefanoquattrini

That is an issue because in general, at low speeds, there cannot be differences in the counting of clocks. Once the clocks have been set in sync while overlapping there is no reason for them be out of sync of that quantity when they are at a distance. That term is simply a time. You should know...

What you wrote is obvious and well-accepted. The issue stays in the classical limit v<<c which is not fulfilled in general

you wrote it like that not me, i wrote this one t'=t-vx/c2 , pay attention!!! it is c 2

you wrote it like that not me, i wrote this one t'=t-vx/c^2 , pay attention!!! it is c2

Which expression are you talking about is incorrect?? ## t'=t-\frac{vx}{c}##?

Yes, low speed and short distances indeed.. but only low-speed v/c<<1 is involved for a classic approximation to be found. There is something ill posed on assuming also short distances Maybe you want to suggest that t'=t-vx/c2 ( first order Lorentz transformation) should be chosen instead of...

By the way are you aware that the Lorentz Transformations in Einstein's version cannot in general reduce to Galilean Transformations?