Recent content by Sup_Principia

Virogen, What I believe the article is describing is what is called the "Mass Defect." In short the Mass Defect is rumored to be the origin of E = mc^2. In concept the "Mass Defect" states that; "The measured mass is less than the sum of its parts!" For example a Helium Atom is...

Chalnoth, you mention that the dark energy truly is a cosmological constant. The speed of light in a vacuum is a cosmological constant. Are you supposing that the dark energy is truly is a cosmological constant, like the speed of light in a vacuum? Are you stating that the Dark Energy has the...

I would disagree that photons are timeless in their experience. Photons have energy. And the Conservation of Energy has never been found to be violated in the universe. So photon energy is timeless in the sense that its energy is always conserved. However because Photons can be "Redshifted;"...

Since you are making it sound like you understand the "SuperInflation" concept as described in the article. Then explain what you think the article means by "SuperInflation" in regards to the "Big Bounce" theory; which would act in contradiction to a "Heat Death" model of the universe; which is...

Chalnoth, can you provide any supporting material for your speculative ideas?

You are right the article does not mention the term "Heat Radiation Gravitation" The article mentions "Superinflation", which in my opinion gives a better interpretion of the term "Superinflation." You are correct the New Scientist is not a peer-reviewed journal, but in the article they...

However, here is some evidence for a peer reviewed article on the subject. And this takes the "Big Bounce" model out of complete speculation; and therefore no forum rule is violated. I have read all of the rules for posting on this forum, and do completely comply...

What really sucks?

Based on your post, you obviously accept that the universe ends up in a "Heat Death" this is perfectly ok. But the original post (OP) asked the question So the answer is that a "Big Bounce" or an "Oscillatory Universe" model allows us to escape the inescapable "Heat Death" This is...

No one knows for sure yet; so all of this is in the speculative nature. So here is some speculation! Let’s consider “Heat Death” as regards to a "Big Bounce" scenario for an "Oscillating" model of the Universe. Which starts off hot, then cools; then gets hot again, and cools again...and on...

See, this is the problem. You are reading "Contrarian" material without "first" understanding what mainstream physics have completely accepted for 100 years now. My suggestion, learn what mainstream physics accepts, first. Then once you have understood that, then focus in on what you see as...

An inertial frame has more than a conceptual meaning. The conceptual reality of the inertial frame is at the heart of the construct of the universe. According to the "Principle of Relativity" there is no inertial frame of reference in the universe that is any more special than any other...

First and foremost; Physics is an exact science, and words do matter. This is like saying, "Is that a soda?" When you really intended to say "Is that a "Coke 'a' Cola!" Second; one of the main tenents of "Special Relativity" is the knowledge of the photon and its speed of light motion...

In the original post (OP) there was no mention of how fast the "Mass" particle was moving. I assumed non-relativistic speed because it was not mentioned! In Shark's question the "Moving Mass" particle decays. He does not say whether the decay object is a "Photon" or another separate "Mass"...

PeterPumpkin, I have read Frank Wilczek's book the "The Lightness of Being: Mass, Ether, and the Unification of Forces" and it is an ok book; I liked it! It is obvious that he is describing an "Aether" or "Ether", the actual word is found in the title of his book. He is a Nobel Prize winner...