Recent content by Syamsu

Putting the data of the pattern in a black box. And putting the data of the which way information in another black box. Then if the data of the which way information is observed, and then the pattern data is observed, it shows no interference pattern. If the which way data is erased from...

Maybe sending is not the right word, the information is channelled to the environment. Maybe information is not the right word, because at this point it hasn't been decided yet which slit it went through. I still don't see how you can know that nothing in the environment, is like what they...

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16495993/ It is shown that which way information from a detector can be erased. How do you know that the environment would preserve which way information 100 percent of the time?

There is a wellknown experiment by Kwiat from 2006 in which they used non interactive measurement of a photon, in order to search a database without running the search algorithm. It has been demonstrated that which way information can be erased in a lab. So then mabye at least some of the...

It would work in a non-interactive way, so it detects the photon without interacting with it. Because the interaction would collapse the wave, and then you would never get an interference pattern.

Basically the detector lights up, anytime it detects a photon passing through the slit. And this light is then sent out to the environment. If someone is looking at the screen, and sees an interference pattern emerge, then they can know, nobody was looking at the slit. Alternatively, if no...

It's the standard double slit experiment, with a non interactive detector at one of the slits. And a screen which shows the pattern of photons going through the slits. So then if you sent out the signal from the detector to the environment, without anybody looking at it, would you then get an...

But if the detector signal is observed all of the time, then only half of the time any energy is sent from the detector to the observer, because the detector is just at 1 slit, and half of the time the photon goes through the other slit.

Which means you assert that if you send the detection signal out to the environment, without someone directly looking at it, that none of the which way information would get lost, remain undecided.

How this would supposedly work is the non-interactive detector at one slit, and then this detector sends out a detection signal to the environment. The pattern coming from the slits is measured, and supposedly when someone is observing the detection signal, then the interference pattern would...