Quantum entanglement ?
Ok, after beating my head with numerous link on net somehow Icould not grasp the idea of quantum entaglement...all i understand is two particles somehow become co-related and then when separated to any distance still maintain co-realation , the moment you see one the...
why everyone is behind black hole...probably becuase no one sees it ..nor any concrete experiments related to blachholes..only assumptions and imginations.
SO why not join in making assumptions on black hole and who is going to hit you back as nothing can be verified...
Why not talk about...
Personaly i disagree that time travel to past is possible...its all doesn't make any sense and
makes the things worst with lot of paradox, and then mutiple universe comes in pcitures..lab la la la...endless ..
what i agree is travel to future is possible but only problem is once you go to...
i will exclude black hole also because so far we haven't able to land on all the planets we could physically see, so no point in discussing something billions of light year away and where we cannot reach.we need to think on more realistic approach.
The time machine idea !
I see lot of discussion going on time machines.
there are different theories but none of them seems to be bringing any results.
what exactly we are lacking in terms of achieving this.
I think we have fairly enough good technology available atleast at atomic level...
Newton said that two masses attact each other but no one know why and how..
decades after A. Einstien said masses curve spacetime and puposed theory of GR.
though his theory seems to be correct at the moment but again no one knows
1) why mass curve spacetime ?
2) can spacetime be created...
Can spacetime be created ? if yes how if not why ?
I understand that spacetime is not physical and more of geometry.
Still bec it exist virtualy ,as gravity depends on warping of spacetime.
So can we ever create this spacetime , does it existing before big bang ??
my question is related to mass and not to specific elements..
as we are dicussing E=mc^2 which is based on mass and not individual elements.
how it is possible that same mass produce same amount of energy even if they belong to different elements. Logically this is possible only if all...
anyway i stongly feel that there is some basic element..
sorry I am not a physics student right now and not aware of any latest therories..
Is there any new theory which say about this basic element i am talking about.
we know atom are madeup of electron and protons and neutron...
Or do we need equations like:
E=mc^2 ----for fission
E=mc^2 * .00000001 ------for combusion like charcoal , wood.
E=mc^2 * .000001 -------for burning petrol.
but we donnt have right ...only E=mc^2.
this simply means every matter is made of same basic element.
So what exactly E=mc^2 says ??
ok all know E=mc2. but apart from that small matter is equi to huge amount of energy what other things can be derived.
1) how could matter directly relate to energy and not individual elements like Uranium, hyd etc. doesn't it mean that all elements and made...