Recent content by thefacemyer

Thank you. I have the dispersion with respect to angle of incidence. I'm not sure why my cavity-dispersion wasn't correct when I used cavity length, though. Thanks again!

If I may, what are you using to graph the dispersion? Let me ask clearly, you get the cubic (eq 1) for the characteristic polynomial?

Thanks! I'll check. Could you tell me what you used for your micro cavity energy?

This is why I've posted the question. There is something wrong, and I need to help finding it. The hamiltonian is correct and comes from the latter referenced article.

The original post of mine is the correct matrix for the characteristic polynomial.

The dispersion for three oscillators like in the SPP case and hybrid polariton case have the same shape. The matrices to be diagonalized are also very similar. https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms14097/figures/2

The matrix is pretty standard in hybrid polaritonics as well as the 3-oscillator dispersion. Taken from: Strong coupling between surface plasmon polaritons and Sulforhodamine 101 dye March 2012 Nanoscale Research Letters 7(1):191 DOI: 10.1186/1556-276X-7-191 Source...

Unfortunately, that isn't the problem (it only worsened the curves).

I am trying to verify the results of the hybrid polariton case with the following hamiltonian, but cannot seem to verify the results in various published papers. Can someone please explain what is wrong and how to get the a similar dispersion graph? I'm solving for the eigenenergies for the...