Recent content by UfoOvni

In that E Section : "In WT a single event (i.e., a photon entering the interferometer) leaves no trace (memory) in the apparatus. The device behaves in the same way for the firstevent and for event number 10000" The result of the experiment I devise has the potential to clarify that sentence...

Thank you. I'm very curious about the experimental outcome and I will not be surprised if the result is not the most expected one. I'm not aware of the theory you have linked. ("EBCM does not faithfully reproduce all experimental data" is not a good start) I do not know if QM can accommodate...

After 30 posts I see no link to an experiment in the required conditions. Boring ping-pong.

sure, if that is your viewpoint then I see no objection to replace the eyes and the neurons of such high-level idea.

http://www.sao.ru/drabek/CCDP/Hamamatsu/CAMERAS/PiasE.htm . It offers a large detection surface (20 mm dia) . and can be scanned (read) while counting ( counting measurement is not affected by the scan TV rate ) There is no need to presume. No one appears to be interested in finding the...

CCD are very common in imaging. I'm sure you can use the same argument on zonde #22 post .

The Fig 1 shows the detector and it appears to be a large die as the ones used in astronomy, cameras, etc (CCD) . The CCD is read during the experiment to the computer, but it was never reseted, imo it is not mentioned nor implicit.

IMO . wrong place to that post.

I will not try to convince anybody of nothing not even that a pristine detector is quite different of one with previous detections already imprinted. IMO the detectors do remember the past (take a photo) ccd, photograph plate. From the beginning this is not about theory nor 'about what I...

In the experiment you cited with C60 (http://www.qudev.ethz.ch/phys4/studentspresentations/waveparticle/arndt_c60molecules.pdf) the emission is not one by one as required in the OP, and the detection is complicated. The detection in this 2013 exp (matter-wave interference) is very complicated...

I'm not discussing, simply asking. I feel far from the initial topic. I'll be back when there is news of an experiment in OP conditions (pristine detector after each detection).

You are almost there: There is no need to link the laser to a computer. Before cleared the CCD must be read and stored to post-process, then: next cycle. I've never had news of such experiment, afaik.

What memoryless detectors are you saying are in use, please ? I'm almost sure that the detector, whatever the technology, is not resetted after each detection (or a few of them). I'm saying this because I never saw it mentioned (either explicit or implied). AFAIK the interference image we saw...

I want to remove any kind of memory in the detector after each detection.

I want the experimental outcome. Can you provide a link to the actual experiment? Was it done?