Recent content by VikramAhuja
-
V
MHB Why is the summation in the first part from k=0 to n-1?
One last question. Why is the summition in the first part sum_{n-1}^{k=0}- VikramAhuja
- Post #12
- Forum: Calculus
-
V
MHB Why is the summation in the first part from k=0 to n-1?
Thanks a lot mate.- VikramAhuja
- Post #11
- Forum: Calculus
-
V
MHB Why is the summation in the first part from k=0 to n-1?
No I'm rather confused with lower sums- VikramAhuja
- Post #9
- Forum: Calculus
-
V
MHB Why is the summation in the first part from k=0 to n-1?
Sorry I edited my post- VikramAhuja
- Post #7
- Forum: Calculus
-
V
MHB Why is the summation in the first part from k=0 to n-1?
Nevermind I got it but now with lower sums?- VikramAhuja
- Post #5
- Forum: Calculus
-
V
MHB Why is the summation in the first part from k=0 to n-1?
Yes I've got to (7/n^2)((43n^2-49n)/2) Apparently it is wrong- VikramAhuja
- Post #3
- Forum: Calculus
-
V
MHB Why is the summation in the first part from k=0 to n-1?
∫(4−7x)dx ====> Integral is from 1 to 8 Similar question but for some reason I can't get the answer after following all the steps- VikramAhuja
- Thread
- Linear Riemann Riemann sums Sums
- Replies: 12
- Forum: Calculus