Insights Blog
-- Browse All Articles --
Physics Articles
Physics Tutorials
Physics Guides
Physics FAQ
Math Articles
Math Tutorials
Math Guides
Math FAQ
Education Articles
Education Guides
Bio/Chem Articles
Technology Guides
Computer Science Tutorials
Forums
Trending
Log in
Register
What's new
Latest activity
Register
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
More options
Style variation
System
Light
Dark
Contact us
Close Menu
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Forums
VikramAhuja
Recent content by VikramAhuja
V
MHB
Why is the summation in the first part from k=0 to n-1?
One last question. Why is the summition in the first part sum_{n-1}^{k=0}
VikramAhuja
Post #12
Apr 25, 2015
Forum:
Calculus
V
MHB
Why is the summation in the first part from k=0 to n-1?
Thanks a lot mate.
VikramAhuja
Post #11
Apr 25, 2015
Forum:
Calculus
V
MHB
Why is the summation in the first part from k=0 to n-1?
No I'm rather confused with lower sums
VikramAhuja
Post #9
Apr 25, 2015
Forum:
Calculus
V
MHB
Why is the summation in the first part from k=0 to n-1?
Sorry I edited my post
VikramAhuja
Post #7
Apr 25, 2015
Forum:
Calculus
V
MHB
Why is the summation in the first part from k=0 to n-1?
Nevermind I got it but now with lower sums?
VikramAhuja
Post #5
Apr 25, 2015
Forum:
Calculus
V
MHB
Why is the summation in the first part from k=0 to n-1?
Yes I've got to (7/n^2)((43n^2-49n)/2) Apparently it is wrong
VikramAhuja
Post #3
Apr 25, 2015
Forum:
Calculus
V
MHB
Why is the summation in the first part from k=0 to n-1?
∫(4−7x)dx ====> Integral is from 1 to 8 Similar question but for some reason I can't get the answer after following all the steps
VikramAhuja
Thread
Apr 25, 2015
Linear
Riemann
Riemann sums
Sums
Replies: 12
Forum:
Calculus
Forums
VikramAhuja
Back
Top