Recent content by vyas22

if the errors of slope are due to measurement and if data converges to any theoretically expected mean value of m consistantly it does make sense to take a weighted average based on frequency of observations rather than arithmatic mean of slopes.. as per central limit theorem value of m should...

Hello Just a suggestion - How about calculating a weighted avarage i.e. (0.79*m1+0.99*m2+0.89*m3)/3 for the average slope and I do not feel the sample size should matter here ..

Thank You all again for your responses, To summarize what i learned here, -Theoretically and debatably distances lesser than Planck length can not exist within normally observed properties and framework of space time -Inverse of Planck length should just mean the number of Planck Length Units...

√ Agreed! @ Phinds - Wikipedia also states 'Profound significance of Planck length in theoretical physics' :) thank you both for responding ..

Hello all, If Planck length (1.61619926 × 10(-35 )meters) places a theoretical limit on minimum possible distance does it also imply that we have a maximum theoretical limit on measurable length as inverse of Planck length (1/Planck Length).. does there any such limit on the maximum...