Recent content by YLW

Thanks everybody, But one more question, forgive me if I'm naive. In my opinion simplifying a problem might be a reason to consider this idea of time flow in both directions as a convenient mathematical tool, but as standard qm is completely sufficient to describe the results, the...

Thanks. Again, forgive me if I'm ignorant but isn't Discover magazine a reputable publication that wouldn't publish the results if they thought it was trash? So sorry to disturb.

Hi, I'm new so I hope I post at the right place ( I think I posted wrongly once already). (http://discovermagazine.com/2010/apr/01-back-from-the-future/article_view?b_start:int=1&-C=) I was just reading about this article on Discover Magazine which suggests that experiments show that events...

Hi, I seldom post so I'm really, really so, so sorry if I've posted in the wrong thread. But I've just been reading through a Discovery magazine article Back From The Future and here are excerpts. (http://discovermagazine.com/2010/apr/01-back-from-the-future/article_view?b_start:int=1&-C=)...

Sorry, one more question. So what do the majority of accepted theories advocate? And what's your view?

Thanks once again JesseM, I really have little or no physics understanding so in your view it is less likely that there is any backward causality or information traveling backwards in this case?

Thanks JesseM but isn't the choice of whether to go to D1 or D2 made randomly by a beam splitter? So sorry if I misunderstood anything...

Hi, I'm new and I've just been reading about the DCQE. I have very little physics knowledge so please bear with me if I ask stupid questions. It was explained many posts (and quite some time) ago in this thread by JesseM that the experiment does not show that the 'choice' made later in time does...