Recent content by zwinkey98

I can see what you're saying here. But, think of it this way. You can go at superluminal speeds if you have a negative net force of gravity acting on you, which'd mean that the space-time continuum is curved upward instead of downward. But this would almost certainly mean that the object...

Maybe. I just read a different article and it seemed like the Sigma factor meant the likely-hood that something's wrong.

Hey, it's not like Einstein got perfect marks in high school. Though, he didn't fail anything, I'm pretty sure he wasn't top of his class. I don't even think he went to college before writing his paper on Special Relativity. So, if you continue to study, you have a shot at writing a paper...

Well, I'll start with a summary of my life story. Up until the 4th grade I was homeschooled, hence I had some academic freedom. I have always excelled in math (learning multiplication when I was about 5 from a computer game) but English always tends to bore me. I've always wanted to learn...

While this does sound like a good explanation for the supposed superluminal neutrinos, don't forget that the experiment and its results have a statistical signifigance factor of 6. I believe that that means there's a 98.6% chance of it being inaccurate.