Can Quantum Field Theories Exhibit S-Dualities with Distinct Lagrangians?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter metroplex021
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the existence of quantum field theories (QFTs) that exhibit S-dualities with distinct Lagrangians. Participants seek examples of QFTs where the classical theories associated with them cannot be represented by similar Lagrangians differing only in the interchange of elementary and composite fields. The inquiry highlights the complexity of dualities in theoretical physics and the need for concrete examples or evidence regarding the possibility of such distinct Lagrangians.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Field Theory (QFT)
  • Familiarity with S-duality concepts
  • Knowledge of Lagrangian mechanics in theoretical physics
  • Basic grasp of classical field theories
NEXT STEPS
  • Research specific examples of QFTs exhibiting S-duality
  • Study the implications of distinct Lagrangians in dualities
  • Explore the role of composite fields in QFT
  • Investigate recent findings in theoretical physics regarding dualities
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, researchers in quantum field theory, and students exploring advanced concepts in dualities and Lagrangian formulations.

metroplex021
Messages
148
Reaction score
0
Hi folks: I have a question on dualities. Does anyone know of a QFT with a (conjectured) S-duality, such that the two classical theories corresponding to that QFT have very different Lagrangians? That is, such that the two classical theories that define the QFT cannot be expressed as essentially same Lagrangian but with the elementary and composite fields interchanged in each case?

I'd really appreciate an example -- or also to know if it isn't possible. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sorry you are not generating any responses at the moment. Is there any additional information you can share with us? Any new findings?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K