Is the current density operator derived from fundamental considerations?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
Paul159
Messages
15
Reaction score
4
Hello,

I found this article. In equation (1) the authors wrote that the current operator is given by : ## - \frac{\delta H}{\delta A} ##.
I just would like to know if this relation is a just definition or if it can be derived from more fundamentals considerations ?

Thanks !
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Quoting from "Many-body quantum theory in condensed matter physics" by Bruus and Flensberg:
"In analytical mechanics ##\vec A## enters through the Lagrangian: ##L=\frac{1}{2}mv^2-V+q \vec v \cdot \vec A## since by the Euler-Lagrange equations yields the Lorentz force. But ##\vec p=\frac{\partial L}{\partial \vec v}=m\vec v + q\vec A##, and via a Legendre transform we get ##H(r,p)=\vec p \cdot \vec v - L(r,v)=\frac{1}{2}mv^2+V=\frac{1}{2m}(\vec p - q\vec A)^2 +V##. Considering infinitesimal variation ##\delta \vec A## we get ##\delta H = H(\vec A +\delta \vec A)-H(\vec A)=-q\vec v \cdot \delta \vec A##".
 
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Paul159 and dRic2