What does K·K = 0 mean in gr-qc/9611042v1?

  • Level: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mentz114
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
2 replies · 2K views
Mentz114
Messages
5,429
Reaction score
292
Reading this paper

http://lanl.arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9611042v1

I'm baffled by this bit on page 3,
The metric of a stationary space-time with time-like Killing vector K = ∂/∂t has the form
ds2 = r(dt + ωidxi)2 − r−1dℓ2 (i, j, ... = 1, 2, 3), (2.1)
where r = K·K is the length square of the Killing vector, ωidxi a 1-form, and dℓ2 = gijdxidxj the metric in the 3-space S of Killing trajectories.
In a footnote on page 4 we are told
Vectors in the tangent 3-space are set in boldface. A dot notation (.) is used for a scalar product with respect to the 3-metric.
By this, K·K = 0 and equation 2.1 is nonsense. What have I missed ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The dot notation from the footnote has parentheses as well, and it is just dot, not a cdot.
 
martinbn said:
The dot notation from the footnote has parentheses as well, and it is just dot, not a cdot.

Yes, thank you. What I missed was that K is not in boldface.

So r = K·K [itex]\equiv[/itex] KμKμ ( μ = 0,1,2,3)
 
Last edited: