What is the importance of relevancy and accuracy in scientific discussions?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Khwartz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    hello everyone
Khwartz
Hello there!

It's a bit strange to registre on a forum about Physics and state having "no background". We have made this choice because we consider it is not "the background" which counts but the Relevancy, the Accuracy of the Logic, Maths and Epistemological points of view which are Provided, and because we didn't chose to make Academic Certificates our Priority up to now but the Deepness Of Understanding of the Sciences.

We hope thous that our post will Help and our possible questions not too much trouble You Guys here! We only ask for Positive Criticism with Sustained Arguments like we have seen on this High Quality Science Forum as it looks to us, which Motivated us to registre.

Regards,
Didier
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to the forum.

Who is "we"?
 
phinds said:
Who is "we"?
The Royal "We." It is the polite form in some circles for a self reference.
 
Tom.G said:
The Royal "We." It is the polite form in some circles for a self reference.
Only if you're the Queen of England :smile:
 
phinds said:
Only if you're the Queen of England :smile:
I seem to detect someone that has had a cloistered life.
 
We will now close this introduction thread. :biggrin:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tom.G and phinds

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K