Why Does the Rule √ab = √a × √b Only Apply When a and b Are Nonnegative?

  • Thread starter Thread starter parshyaa
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
6 replies · 10K views
parshyaa
Messages
307
Reaction score
19

Homework Statement



Prove that √ab = √a × √b is possible for all the value of a and b except when both are less than 0 at the same time .[/B]

Homework Equations



√(-a)b =(√a)i × b = (√ab)i

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't know how to start, to prove this type of question, but i think that there must be an answer for this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Divide it into four cases according to whether each of a and b is <0 or ##\geq 0##. For the case where both are ##\geq 0## it is easy. For the two where only one of them is ##\geq 0##, use the formula to prove the equation true. For when both are negative, prove it false.
 
BvU said:
So what goes wrong when both a and b are < 0 ?

This happens if a and b are less than 0, √36 = √(-4)(-9) = √(-4) × √(-9) = 2i × 3i = -6(which is wrong)
Why √ab = √a × √b not works when both are less than 0. It works when only one of them is less than 0, ex: √-36 = √(-9)(4) = (3i) × 2 = 6i, then why it not works when both of them are less than 0
 
We've had this before, haven't we ?
parshyaa said:
Okk, then why it is applicable here: √(-4)(9) = √-36 = 6i , √4i.√9 =6i, why in this example we divided negative number's root and positve numbered root. Why can we do this operation if only one of them is negative, why can't we do it for both the negative numbers.
I think answer is because it gives wrong answer.
You did check fresh's suggested link, I suppose ? Nothing unclear any more in that insight ?
fresh_42 said:
As usual when these questions come up, I want to recommend the following article:
https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/things-can-go-wrong-complex-numbers/

This is understandable if you are a bit familiar with complex numbers. You understand it has nothing to do with the modulus of the numbers (the absolute value), only with the arguments. Our definition of square root of -1 = ##i## and not ##-i## has a lot to do with it.

You repeat the question: Why ?

So apparently the answer isn't fully understandable for you. However, repeating those answers won't help. Perhaps you can get us out of this loop by specifying what exactly it is that's hard to understand ?
 
BvU said:
You did check fresh's suggested link,

Yes i checked his link and i got everything which was written in his link.


BvU said:
You repeat the question: Why ?
I repeated this question because, i fully understood fresh's link and it was written there:
Rule 2
If x,y≥0 and n∈R, then and only then (xy)^n = x^n × y^n and therefore we can't write √(-a)(-b) =√(-a) . √(-b), note here a and b are positive numbers.
But this is not my question, my question is why the above rule is only applicabe if x,y>0 why it is not apllicable when x,y<0
 
Last edited by a moderator:
parshyaa said:
I repeated this question because, i fully understood fresh's link and it was written there:
Rule 2
If x,y≥0 and n∈R, then and only then (xy)^n = x^n × y^n and therefore we can't write √(-a)(-b) =√(-a) . √(-b), note here a and b are positive numbers.
But this is not my question, my question is why the above rule is only applicabe if x,y>0 why it is not apllicable when x,y<0
The reason is that, for a < 0 and b < 0, ##\sqrt{(-a) \cdot (-b)} = \sqrt{a \cdot b}##, which is a real, positive number. However, ##\sqrt{-a} \cdot \sqrt{-b} = (-1)\sqrt{ab}##, which is a real, negative number. Obviously a positive number can't also be negative. This is the reason for the restriction that both a and b must be nonnegative.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: parshyaa