Neutroscopic methods in General Relativity

[Rade]

Application of new logic to General Relativity. Authored by two physicists and one mathematician:
http://www.gallup.unm.edu/~smarandache/NeutrosophicRelativity.pdf
Any comments, pro or con ?

[HallsofIvy]

Smarandache is a well known crank.

By the way, the word is "neutroSOPHIC", not "neutroSCOPIC". It is, according to Smarandache's own words, a way to "interpret the uninterpretable".

[Garth]

Smarandache is a well known crank.
wiki on Florentin Smarandache (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florentin_Smarandache) interesting and different maybe, but on what basis do you call him a crank?

Garth

[Rade]

Smarandache is a well known crank.
By the way, the word is "neutroSOPHIC", not "neutroSCOPIC". It is, according to Smarandache's own words, a way to "interpret the uninterpretable".Thank you for spelling correction. Smarandache is not the lead author, the lead author and third author are physicists. I was just interested in hearing if there is any new physics in the merge of the two concepts,e.g, (neutrosophic theory) and (general relativity theory). I find that neutrosophic theory has overlap with neutral monistic philosophy of which I have an interest. Some might argue that quantum mechanics interprets the uninterpretable, no ?

[pervect]

wiki on Florentin Smarandache (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Florentin_Smarandache) interesting and different maybe, but on what basis do you call him a crank?
Garth

I was not particularly familair with this author, but

http://www.gallup.unm.edu/~smarandache/BeginAdventure.pdf

looks pretty cranky to me.

[Garth]

I was not particularly familair with this author, but
http://www.gallup.unm.edu/~smarandache/BeginAdventure.pdf
looks pretty cranky to me.
Agreed!

Garth