How Do Particle Physicists Measure the Relativistic Energy of Tardyons?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Particle physicists measure the relativistic energy of tardyons primarily using calorimeters, which quantify the energy deposited by particles. While calorimeters can measure kinetic energy, they can also determine rest energy through particle-antiparticle annihilation, although this method is less precise. Advanced calorimeters incorporate known rest masses, such as those of muons, to enhance accuracy. Additionally, charged particles can be analyzed using cyclotrons, where the radius of the particle's circular motion and its speed are measured to calculate relativistic mass and total inertial energy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calorimeters in particle physics
  • Familiarity with relativistic mass and energy concepts
  • Knowledge of cyclotron principles and magnetic fields
  • Basic grasp of particle-antiparticle interactions
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the workings of Liquid Argon Calorimeters
  • Study the principles of electromagnetic vs. hadronic calorimeters
  • Learn about the cyclotron relation p = qBr and its applications
  • Explore particle-antiparticle annihilation and its energy implications
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, researchers in experimental physics, and students studying energy measurement techniques in high-energy physics will benefit from this discussion.

bernhard.rothenstein
Messages
988
Reaction score
1
how do we measure the relativistic energy of a tardyon?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The laboratory answer is via calorimeters,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calorimeter_(particle_physics )
 
Last edited by a moderator:
pervect said:
The laboratory answer is via calorimeters,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calorimeter_(particle_physics )
A calorimeter will only measure the kinetic energy of a particle, not the total energy.

Pete
 
Last edited by a moderator:
One can also determine rest energy via calorimetry if one looks at particle /antiparticle annhiliation.

This may not be the most precise way of determining rest energy, though.

Also, I took the question to be more in terms of measuring the energy of a single particle, i.e. the particle physics version of the calorimeter. The original principle was based on measuring the actual heat energy, but they have since then become more sophisticated and complicated. Some of the more sophisticated versions routinely take into account known rest masses, i.e. they identify that a muon was created, and add in the known energy to do that into the particle energy.

Besides the Wiki article,

http://www2.slac.stanford.edu/vvc/glossary.html

talks about this a little

Calorimeter
In particle physics, any device that can measure the energy deposited in it by particles (originally a device that measured heat energy deposited, thus a calorie-meter). More Information: Liquid Argon Calorimeter, How does a Calorimeter Work?, Warm Iron Calorimeter

going into a lot of the details (Visit the above links and click on the sub-links - also see electromagnetic vs hadronic calorimeters).

I hope that this was the answer that was being looked for - i.e. how do particle physicists actually measure the energy of particles.
 
bernhard.rothenstein said:
how do we measure the relativistic energy of a tardyon?
If the particle is charged then use a cyclotron. Assume B (strength of magnetic field) is a given. Measure r = radius of circle particle is moving in. Measure the speed the particle is moving at. Then use the cyclotron relation p = qBr derived here

http://www.geocities.com/physics_world/sr/cyclotron.htm

to get m = p/v = relativistic mass. Multiply by c^2 to get E = total inertial energy.

Pete
 
pervect said:
I hope that this was the answer that was being looked for - i.e. how do particle physicists actually measure the energy of particles.
Actually that only tells you the kinetic energy, not the total energy. Are you saying that a calorimeter measures E, not K? In any case the rest energy is so small compared to the kinetic energy there is little difference between the two.

Pete
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
7K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
824
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K