Bush trip to Mars a red herring [Archive]

Ivan Seeking

Jan15-04, 06:21 PM

Over the past 23 years, Hope estimates he has made $6.25 million selling land on the moon and the planets, primarily Mars and Venus.

For $19.99, along with a $1.51 lunar tax, you, too, can buy an acre on the moon or Mars. Hope even will send you a deed. If you don't like it, he gives a 30-day, money-back guarantee.

"I am fully aware of what I am doing," he says. "I am not operating a scam. I am taking advantage of an opportunity shown to me by a loophole in the law. I am exercising my right to be as profitable as possible."...

...In a flash, he remembered something he learned 12 years earlier while taking a political science class at an Oregon college.

His professor discussed the Outer Space Treaty of 1967, signed by all members of the United Nations. Hope remembered that all governments agreed no nation would have sovereignty or control over any of the celestial bodies.

But they did not mention individuals owning planets, he recalled. He drove to the local library to check whether his memory had failed him. It hadn't.

"When they passed the treaty, they probably never thought about individuals," Hope said. "It may have been an innocent mistake. So I filed a declaration of ownership for the moon and the eight other planets and their moons."

He filed his declaration of ownership in the local courthouse and quickly sent letters to the governments of the United States, Soviet Union and the United Nations. In those letters he expressed his ownership rights and intention to sell and subdivide the moon and planets.

"I said if they had any problem with it, let me know," Hope said. "I am still waiting to hear from them."

http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2003/Sep-29-Mon-2003/news/22251899.html

jimmy p

Jan16-04, 06:36 PM

where do i send my cheque???? [6)] at the rate we are 'exploring' people will be dying to buy moonland.. gotta be ahead of the game in the property market!

Tsu

Jan16-04, 08:25 PM

Originally posted by jimmy p
where do i send my cheque???? [6)] at the rate we are 'exploring' people will be dying to buy moonland.. gotta be ahead of the game in the property market!
The three most important words in real estate:
Location, location, location. [;)]

Nereid

Jan16-04, 11:03 PM

But what if oil, uranium, and WMD were discovered on 'your' lunar (or martian) half acre/bottom paddock/plot?

Tsu

Jan16-04, 11:38 PM

Originally posted by Nereid
But what if oil, uranium, and WMD were discovered on 'your' lunar (or martian) half acre/bottom paddock/plot?
Uhhh... Be a true capitalist, sell off all three to the highest bidder, and get real rich real fast?

Ivan Seeking

Jan17-04, 05:17 AM

TREATY ON PRINCIPLES GOVERNING THE ACTIVITIES OF STATES IN THE EXPLORATION AND USE OF OUTER SPACE, INCLUDING THE MOON AND OTHER CELESTIAL BODIES

http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/mir/outerspacetrty.html

jimmy p

Jan17-04, 12:37 PM

Hey, that was written on the earth, if im on my plot of land on the moon i'm not gonna care!

Nereid

Jan17-04, 01:47 PM

Originally posted by jimmy p
Hey, that was written on the earth, if im on my plot of land on the moon i'm not gonna care! You WILL care if Rummy thinks - or can be persuaded - that you have WMD [:D]

Loren Booda

Jan17-04, 01:47 PM

Get out your space pen and sign on the dotted geodesic...

Evo

Jan17-04, 04:36 PM

Funny, a few days ago one of the advertising banners here at PF was selling land on the moon.

Ok, for all of you outer space entrepreneurs, here is the site to actually file claims for extra terrestrial ownership. It's not a joke site. Although, I would say that the people filing the claims are a little looney.
http://www.permanent.com/archimedes/register.htm

Lawrence D. Roberts, the Director of the Archimedes Institute, is an academic specializing in issues of space law and policy. The author of numerous articles on international law and space law and policy, Professor Roberts is a member of the faculty at the Fordham University Graduate School of Business. He has taught at New York University School of Law, Seton Hall Law School, New England School of Law and the City University of New York School of Law. He received his Bachelor of Arts degree from Columbia University, his Juris Doctor degree from Cornell Law School and his Master of Laws degree from New York University School of Law. A former chair of the American Bar Association's Committee on United States Aerospace Law and Policy, Roberts currently Chairs the A.B.A.'s Committee on International Aerospace Law, the National Space Society's Policy Committee and the X Prize Foundation's Law and Policy Committee.

Mr. Robin Parsons

Jan17-04, 05:21 PM

from Ivans link..
Actually, these and other nations have no right to stop him because they surrendered any ownership rights in the U.N. treaty, Hope said.
If they have "no right to stop him" on the basis of "no ownership rights" then they also have no right to validate, either, him, or his claim, nor responcibility to protect his 'rights' that he doesn't really have and really cannot enforce...legally speaking(?)

Evo

Jan17-04, 06:27 PM

Originally posted by Mr. Robin Parsons
from Ivans link..

If they have "no right to stop him" on the basis of "no ownership rights" then they also have no right to validate, either, him, or his claim, nor responcibility to protect his 'rights' that he doesn't really have and really cannot enforce...legally speaking(?) This is a very grey area in space law right now.

"Article II of the 1967 Outer Space Treaty1 prohibits national appropriation of outer space, but it does not prohibit private appropriation.2 Hence, private entities may appropriate area in outer space or on a celestial body, although states may not.

Because the relationship between property and territorial sovereignty differs under common law and civil law systems, it is not immediately clear whether Article II would permit national governments to confer property rights upon private entities under their jurisdiction."

Mr. Robin Parsons

Jan17-04, 08:10 PM

Originally posted by Evo
This is a very grey area in space law right now.
"Article II of the 1967 Outer Space Treaty1 prohibits national appropriation of outer space, but it does not prohibit private appropriation.2 Hence, private entities may appropriate area in outer space or on a celestial body, although states may not.
Because the relationship between property and territorial sovereignty differs under common law and civil law systems, it is not immediately clear whether Article II would permit national governments to confer property rights upon private entities under their jurisdiction."
Whats not immediate, two differing nations could confer the same rights to two distinct and separate coporate (and or private) landclaimers, and you now have a conflict that the two states enter into via their respective assignatin of rights that they assign in a place where they enforce no rights, nor can support 'ownership' rights, and haven't the right to assign 'the right' that they don't really possess 'to assign' in the first place, perhaps it should only be "People from Earth" who travel out/off of this planets atmosphere/face...whadda ya think?

jimmy p

Jan17-04, 08:17 PM

Lol, im not from the US of A so i dont give a damn what Donald Rumsfield wants. Being a Brit means that we have a walk-over leader, he will let us by land on Mars for our own inscrutable purposes if we pressurise him enough and threaten not to vote for him. what a loser [:)]

Evo

Jan17-04, 09:13 PM

Originally posted by Mr. Robin Parsons
Whats not immediate, two differing nations could confer the same rights to two distinct and separate coporate (and or private) landclaimers, and you now have a conflict that the two states enter into via their respective assignatin of rights that they assign in a place where they enforce no rights, nor can support 'ownership' rights, and haven't the right to assign 'the right' that they don't really possess 'to assign' in the first place, perhaps it should only be "People from Earth" who travel out/off of this planets atmosphere/face...whadda ya think? You've hit the nail on the head!

One of the propositions is that there be some type of "homesteading" requirement where an individual that wants to make a "claim" has to actually set up residence for a set period of years, making improvements to property, etc..., similar to existing homesteading laws. For example one person has filed a claim on our Sun. I'd love to see him homestead. [;)]

Space law is going to be extremely difficult unless they exclude individual claims as well as government claims.

The people of earth are being rather presumptuous in thinking that they have any rights to claim anything off this planet.

For all we know an alien could show up with a deed to our planet and tell us we've got 48 hours to evacuate. I'm being silly, but obviously for individual and business claims it's about potential money if we ever do manage to venture forth and begin to destroy other celestial bodies for fun and profit.

Ivan Seeking

Jan18-04, 12:53 AM

Possession is nine tenths of the law...thus the new space race?

This all strikes me a bit as the birth pangs of a new gold rush.

jimmy p

Jan18-04, 04:55 AM

I CALL SATURN!!! [6)]

Mr. Robin Parsons

Jan18-04, 07:27 AM

Originally posted by jimmy p
I CALL SATURN!!! [6)] Ya cool, but I have the "mineral rights" so if you need to use anything beneath your feet, well send chq. or Money orders C/O "Saturnia mining Co" or simply insert cash in the slot provided...

___________________________
Money Slot, insert $ above

jimmy p

Jan18-04, 02:20 PM

Garn, shoulda thought of that one....however you will have to pay comission yourself to get access to my private property and do you work so i expect a hefty cheque to come MY way! [:D]

Mr. Robin Parsons

Jan18-04, 02:47 PM

Originally posted by jimmy p
Garn, shoulda thought of that one....however you will have to pay comission yourself to get access to my private property and do you work so i expect a hefty cheque to come MY way! [:D]

[6)] [6)] go read the law buddy...[6)] [6)]

Evo

Jan18-04, 03:05 PM

Originally posted by Mr. Robin Parsons
[6)] [6)] go read the law buddy...[6)] [6)] True, if Mr Parsons has the mineral rights, I don't believe you can stop him from tearing your property up to get what is his.

It's been awhile, but when I lived in Houston, TX, a new house I bought was on land previously owned by Exxon and they were retaining the mineral rights. I had to sign papers acknowledging that if they ever thought there was anything of value under my house, they could basically bulldoze my house to get to it. I looked at the attorney and he said "don't worry, they wouldn't be selling the property unless they were sure there was nothing there, so it's unlikely they will ever do this". [8)]

Mr. Robin Parsons

Jan18-04, 03:09 PM

Have read the same kind of thing having happened here in Kingston's surrounding area's, Ontario's law (I think)...

jimmy p

Jan18-04, 03:11 PM

[!:)] [!:)] DAMMIT!!![!:)] [!:)] humph well, its my planet my rules. [:(] Ok, well i'll lay claim on Uranus too, no-one will wanna mine up there!! [:D]

Evo

Jan18-04, 03:25 PM

Originally posted by jimmy p
[!:)] [!:)] DAMMIT!!![!:)] [!:)] humph well, its my planet my rules. [:(] Ok, well i'll lay claim on Uranus too, no-one will wanna mine up there!! [:D] Chopnik, get the mineral rights!!! [:))]

jimmy p

Jan18-04, 03:29 PM

OOH OOH QUICKLY!!! mineral rights are mine too HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!

hey mom, im suprised you didnt get them first! [:)]

Evo

Jan18-04, 03:43 PM

Originally posted by jimmy p
OOH OOH QUICKLY!!! mineral rights are mine too HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!

hey mom, im suprised you didnt get them first! [:)] I'm relying on you son! BTW, you're half American now. [;)]

jimmy p

Jan18-04, 03:48 PM

I wont fail you!!! oh yeah, point taken!

Tsu

Jan18-04, 04:07 PM

Originally posted by jimmy p
[!:)] [!:)] DAMMIT!!![!:)] [!:)] humph well, its my planet my rules. [:(] Ok, well i'll lay claim on Uranus too, no-one will wanna mine up there!! [:D]
I can almost gaurantee that no one will be wanting to mine around Uranus.[:D]

Tsu

Jan18-04, 04:09 PM

Originally posted by Evo
I'm relying on you son! BTW, you're half American now. [;)]

'MOM'?
'SON'?

Evo! When did you become Mrs. Chopnik?!!! [o)]

jimmy p

Jan18-04, 04:28 PM

she has adopted me! [:D] [:D] [:D]

Nereid

Jan18-04, 04:46 PM

Mr Parsons said this comment is more appropriate here ...

"SelfAdjoint also mentioned Karl Rove (in another post); I just read up on him - given that
a) this is an election year in the US,
b) that Texas and Florida are important to the Republicans,
c) the Bush Mars initiative should bring in lots of votes for that party in those states,
d) there was no advance signaling of this initiative,
e) Bush has shown no interest in science or space before, and
f) the Mars initiative will not be funded out of any Bush budget (it will come later)
... it's hard to see this as anything but a deeply cynical move (I'm resisting the urge to say something about a certain Middle-Eastern country).

Shall I compare thee to ... a pig? Just as likely to fly." [:((] [:((] [:((]

The Iraq reference? Bush et al have shown, beyond any doubt, that they are quite prepared to tell bald-faced lies (which result in the deaths of thousands) to suit their objectives of securing oil supplies (thanks to Russ for this); what's a little disingenuousness over Mars between advisors? After all, the only people who will be hurt will be a few hundred astronomers and planetary scientists; oh, and some disappointment among young and old science-lovers. Small price to pay for better Republican control.

I'm very depressed by this news; normally I see ponies everywhere [*(] [*(] [*(]

Mr. Robin Parsons

Jan18-04, 08:13 PM

Originally posted by Nereid
(SNIP) Mr Parsons said this comment is more appropriate here ...
(SNoP)
Hummm I had said "Politics and World Affairs", but not this specific thread, but it does seem to fit, just that, I was just about to announce that I had discovered (and patented) the Holy Grail of all Bi !Nth opportunities, the Patent rights to the original structure of the universe, of which everything in the universe is made of, hence My declaration that I (Mr. Robin Parsons AT # !1 "No" space) am sole proprietor of everything material/physical/structural{ly designed out of my original model} in the entirety of the Universe...but your getting in my way Nereid! [g)]

[6)] [:D] [6)]

Evo

Jan18-04, 08:51 PM

Originally posted by Mr. Robin Parsons
Hummm I had said "Politics and World Affairs", but not this specific thread, but it does seem to fit, just that, I was just about to announce that I had discovered (and patented) the Holy Grail of all Bi !Nth opportunities, the Patent rights to the original structure of the universe, of which everything in the universe is made of, hence My declaration that I (Mr. Robin Parsons AT # !1 "No" space) am sole proprietor of everything material/physical/structural{ly designed out of my original model} in the entirety of the Universe...but your getting in my way Nereid! [g)]

[6)] [:D] [6)] I want to be Mr. Robin Parsons' best friend. [:D]

Tsu

Jan18-04, 08:54 PM

Mr. Robin Parsons

Jan19-04, 08:30 AM

Originally posted by Tsunami
Mr. Robin Parsons, you are truly a permanent resident of the ozone!
(jeez, and MY friends call ME whacky...[:D] [6)] [;)])
Must be a typo [g)] , you said OZone, not "No" Zone/(AKA 'space')
Whew!

P.S. Careful how you address me there Bud [8)], I just aquired this little right[6)] back there, and well, what is your breathing rate, Hummm ten cents per (x)liters of air ^ population of planet ^ Average rate per person + tax = How much? [o)] send your tributes to....

[a)] [6)] [6)] [6)] [a)]

Phobos

Jan19-04, 04:24 PM

Originally posted by Loren Booda
What credit should President Bush receive for suggesting a manned Mars trip?

Strongly depends on whether it gets funded or not, I suppose.

Phobos

Jan19-04, 04:28 PM

Originally posted by Mr. Robin Parsons
Ya cool, but I have the "mineral rights" so if you need to use anything beneath your feet, well send chq. or Money orders C/O "Saturnia mining Co" or simply insert cash in the slot provided...

You can have Saturn's mining rights...it's just a light-weight planet anyway. I'll take the mining rights to Neptune where it rains diamonds...
http://www.berkeley.edu/news/berkeleyan/1999/1006/diamonds.html

Someone else can have Uranus and be the butt of the jokes.

Mr. Robin Parsons

Jan19-04, 04:32 PM

Originally posted by Phobos
Strongly depends on whether it gets funded or not, I suppose. Yes and one of the points made was that it wouldn't be out of money that he would be, then, accountable towards...it is not exactly a new Idea, but coming from a President it does carry more thought...but the Title indicates the Originating Authors belief (Loren Booda) that it was a "Red Herring" hence what followed fell into proprietary rights to the end result of such ventures, something that I had wanted to point out as being probably different then what most think of "off of the cuff" so to speak, to be there, on Mars, and live, growing food, and reliant upon only 'self sufficiency' not what would be called a tourist trip. (although it would probably make for a great adventure, as a tourist trip!) {Go figure!}

Evo

Jan19-04, 05:30 PM

Originally posted by Phobos
You can have Saturn's mining rights...it's just a light-weight planet anyway. I'll take the mining rights to Neptune where it rains diamonds... Phobos, when DeBeers finds out about you, you'll be toast. [;)]

Interesting article BTW, thanks!

Tsu

Jan19-04, 07:31 PM

Originally posted by Phobos
You can have Saturn's mining rights...it's just a light-weight planet anyway. I'll take the mining rights to Neptune where it rains diamonds...
http://www.berkeley.edu/news/berkeleyan/1999/1006/diamonds.html

Someone else can have Uranus and be the butt of the jokes.
Oo. Oo.
Evo, you can have Mr. Robin Parsons. I wanna be PHOBOS' best friend!!! [:D] [:D] [:D]

I believe jimmy p has Uranus covered. [;)] [:D] [:D] [;)] Ar ar ar...

edit: You know... cover yer anus... HEY!!! Maybe we should change CYA to CU!!![g)] [:D] (OK, sorry. I'll stop now.)

Evo

Jan19-04, 07:50 PM

Originally posted by Tsunami
[B]Oo. Oo.
Evo, you can have Mr. Robin Parsons. I wanna be PHOBOS' best friend!!! [:D] [:D] [:D] Noooo, I wanna be Phobos's best friend. Phobos...do you like chocolate? [:D]

I believe jimmy p has Uranus covered. [;)] [:D] [:D] [;)] Ar ar ar... Oh dear, I did not understand the full extent of chopnik's meaning...Originally posted by Chopnik
Ok, well i'll lay claim on Uranus too, no-one will wanna mine UP THERE!! [o)]

Tsu

Jan19-04, 09:02 PM

Originally posted by Evo
Noooo, I wanna be Phobos's best friend. Phobos...do you like chocolate? [:D]
BACK!! GET BACK!!! (*cracks whip*)
HE'S MINE, I TELL YOU!! I HAVE DOCUMENTED FIRST CLAIM!!!! I HAVE CHOCOLATES, TOO, PHOBOS!!!!

Oh dear, I did not understand the full extent of chopnik's meaning... [o)]
A senior moment?[:D]

Evo

Jan19-04, 09:10 PM

Originally posted by Tsunami
A senior moment?[:D] There are actually vitamin supplements on the market called "senior moment", perhaps I need some...[:(]

Mr. Robin Parsons

Jan19-04, 09:14 PM

Originally posted by Phobos
You can have Saturn's mining rights...it's just a light-weight planet anyway. I'll take the mining rights to Neptune where it rains diamonds...
http://www.berkeley.edu/news/berkeleyan/1999/1006/diamonds.html
Someone else can have Uranus and be the butt of the jokes. Didn't read the link yet, but you missed it as I have very clearly Claimed to own ALL MATTER IN THE UNIVERSE! so if you want Neptune, please,...line up! (license rights to all processes will be made available, shortly, right after I figure out the Fee schedule(s))

[6)] [a)] [6)]

Nereid

Jan19-04, 09:14 PM

Originally posted by Evo
There are actually vitamin supplements on the market called "senior moment", perhaps I need some...[:(] And your daughter's but 16? I think not.

Evo

Jan19-04, 10:05 PM

Thanks Nereid. [:)]

Tsu

Jan19-04, 10:45 PM

Originally posted by Evo
There are actually vitamin supplements on the market called "senior moment", perhaps I need some...[:(]
Do they give discounts for group or bulk purchases?

Tsu

Jan19-04, 10:54 PM

Originally posted by Nereid
And your daughter's but 16? I think not.
suck up... [6)] She's OLD, man! Almost as old as me. (shut up. stop that maniacal laughter! STOP IT, I say!!)

Evo

Jan19-04, 11:47 PM

Originally posted by Tsunami
Do they give discounts for group or bulk purchases? Shall we go in on a bulk purchase? [:)]

She's OLD, man! Almost as old as me. (shut up. stop that maniacal laughter! STOP IT, I say!!)As a "former" good friend of mine once told me..."You know, we're not getting any younger OR better looking". [*(]

BTW Nereid, a truck load of chocolate is coming your way.... [6)]

Tsu

Jan20-04, 12:30 PM

Bulk sounds good. Do they have a long shelf life? Not that I'LL last all that long...[:D] Specially the way I crashed on my ski this past summer...

And she is your 'former' friend because of what she said? YIKES! Guess I'd better watch my mouth!! [:D] But, HEY! At least you didn't get a birthday card that said "On your birthday, may no one look at your dog, and then at your hairstyle and say OH! WHAT A *CUTE* IDEA!!!"[:D] [o)] [*(]

Andy

Jan20-04, 01:29 PM

LOL at all of the old People!

jimmy p

Jan20-04, 05:22 PM

i agree with andy. i laugh at your age. [:D] [6)] (apart from the people that are nice to me...chocolates all round! [;)] )

Tsu

Jan20-04, 06:14 PM

You two ever heard of Karma? It's not nice to make fun of old people. 'Sides - I could ski BOTH your butts off in a heartbeat![:D]

Chopnik, you're in deep doodoo with your adopted mom.[;)] [o)]

jimmy p

Jan20-04, 06:21 PM

Kar...Ma??? isnt that some sort of curry??? my adopted mom isnt old! [6)] . Its not nice to make fun of old people? well they always insulted us as kids, ragamuffins, rapscallions, scallywags, whippersnappers, little s**ts... its about time they get their cummupence.

I think it would be quite amusing to watch me ski, i think a new born lamb would have more grasp of it then i would... stay on its feet longer anyway!! [b(]

Evo

Jan20-04, 06:25 PM

Originally posted by jimmy p
i agree with andy. i laugh at your age. [:D] [6)] What, you guys aren't going to get any older? [;)]

(apart from the people that are nice to me...chocolates all round!) [;)] Too late, the damage has been done. [b(] Young whipper snappers. You two get close enough & I'll hit you both with my cane!

Are we off topic?

Evo

Jan20-04, 06:28 PM

Originally posted by jimmy p
my adopted mom isnt old! [6)] SON!!!! [:D] I knew you were just momentarily led astray by Andy!!!! [!:)]

Tsu

Jan20-04, 07:02 PM

Originally posted by Evo
SON!!!! [:D] I knew you were just momentarily led astray by Andy!!!! [!:)]
Yes, Chopnik. Do not trust anyone who looks like George W. Bush!!

Tsu

Jan20-04, 07:05 PM

Originally posted by Evo
Are we off topic?
No, we're still talking about Bush...[6)]

Loren Booda

Jan20-04, 10:29 PM

I was waiting in the shadows to see if I would set a personal record for replies - ironically almost all off-topic - to a thread that I started.

Tsu

Jan20-04, 10:56 PM

Originally posted by Loren Booda
I was waiting in the shadows to see if I would set a personal record for replies - ironically almost all off-topic - to a thread that I started.
So did I blow your record by mentioning Bush again?[:(]

jimmy p

Jan21-04, 10:12 AM

aww mom, i was only joking!! me n andy are still allowed to play together, right?

(STOP HAVING A DIRTY MIND PEOPLE [that does mean you too Tsunami]) [6)]

Mr. Robin Parsons

Jan21-04, 10:46 AM

Ya sorta 'gotta' admit Loren, that your original entrance does allow for some latitude in the discourse... Your titular intro
Originally posted by Loren Booda
Bush trip to Mars a red herring *Notice* No question mark, it is a statement....but...
Followed by your postulate...
Originally posted by Loren Booda
What credit should President Bush receive for suggesting a manned Mars trip? Does he scheme to one-up Kennedy, evade failed policy, or nationalize the world (all for ~$500,000,000,000)?
Four questions, from which we seemed to have opted for the "Nationalizing the World" Well, our version according to the current scheme of 'legalisms' repsective of property Rights...so here's yet another responce to add to your search for a title in responcivness's....

Loren Booda

Jan21-04, 12:15 PM

My original post was genuine but seemed to become hijacked. Basically, I thought most responses there just an exercise in lame humor rather than a discourse on "nationalizing the world."

What political motives do you think George W. Bush intended when he announced the program for a manned Mars mission? Do you think he has an unselfish interest in the science and humanity of the project?

Nereid

Jan21-04, 12:48 PM

Loren Booda wrote:What political motives do you think George W. Bush intended when he announced the program for a manned Mars mission? Do you think he has an unselfish interest in the science and humanity of the project? Purely cynical - how to get a few thousand more votes (esp in Florida and Texas) without really trying. Hey Loren, I posted my opinion earlier in this thread.

Later, based on something mouseonmoon (I think) said, somewhere in Astronomy, I revised my opinion: following Condie's counsel about how the US's star has begun to fade (China is the new big boy), Dubya wants a nice page in the history books, preferrably better than JFK's (but without getting shot). So, what the Moon was to JFK (beat that Ruskies!), so Mars is to GW (in your face, Hu!).

Mars wasn't in the SOU address, so maybe Karl's focus groups weren't so maximum bullish on Mars?

selfAdjoint

Jan21-04, 04:34 PM

Originally posted by Nereid
Purely cynical - how to get a few thousand more votes (esp in Florida and Texas) without really trying. Hey Loren, I posted my opinion earlier in this thread.

Later, based on something mouseonmoon (I think) said, somewhere in Astronomy, I revised my opinion: following Condie's counsel about how the US's star has begun to fade (China is the new big boy), Dubya wants a nice page in the history books, preferrably better than JFK's (but without getting shot). So, what the Moon was to JFK (beat that Ruskies!), so Mars is to GW (in your face, Hu!).

Mars wasn't in the SOU address, so maybe Karl's focus groups weren't so maximum bullish on Mars?

Both the initiatives that week, Mars and the immigration plan, were pitched to make the president look like a big historic figure in the eyes of the voters. Both of them backfired. Mars looks like a joke to everybody but a tiny sliver of space enthusiasts, and immigration has got the Republican core up in arms. Bummer for Rove.

Mr. Robin Parsons

Jan21-04, 04:46 PM

Originally posted by Loren Booda
My original post was genuine but seemed to become hijacked. Basically, I thought most responses there just an exercise in lame humor rather than a discourse on "nationalizing the world." Little bit of both, perhaps?

What political motives do you think George W. Bush intended when he announced the program for a manned Mars mission? Do you think he has an unselfish interest in the science and humanity of the project? Not an American, no point in 'opinion'(ing) on US politics so directly...
HUH?? WHAT?? [o)] [o)] [o)] You think my Humor is LAME??? Thats LAMMO BUDDY! [6)] [6)] [6)] So At least Phuleeeeeeeeeease use the right WORD! [g)] [6)] [:))] [a)] [8)] [o)]

(P.S. try to remember here "Bud", I own the material Universe, a little courtesy pleaseHee-hee-heeeeeeeeeeeee! [6)] )

Loren Booda

Jan21-04, 05:09 PM

Nereid,

I re-read and regard the "6 ways to Bushwhack the grassroots."

Tsu

Jan21-04, 06:07 PM

I thing everything Shrub does and says in his speeches is purly politically motivated, designed to help him get re-elected - right down to using statistics from Kerry's home state during his state of the union address. These STATS were used to make Kerry look bad. Whenever he ad-libs, he generally ends up shooting himself in the foot, so he's usually good for at least a laugh about once a week. Didn't he just recently sign an environmental bill (clean-air, I think) and then 2-3 days later quietly sign another bill allowing his favorite corporations to continue their polluting practices for another 10 years or so?

russ_watters

Jan22-04, 03:37 AM

Originally posted by Tsunami
I thing everything Shrub does and says in his speeches is purly politically motivated, designed to help him get re-elected - right down to using statistics from Kerry's home state during his state of the union address. ...which makes him (gasp!) just like every other politician.

I don't judge politicians on their primary motive because they all have the same primary motive (get elected) otherwise they'd never be elected. The secondary motives are the ones that separate them.

Zero

Jan22-04, 08:53 AM

Originally posted by russ_watters
...which makes him (gasp!) just like every other politician.

I don't judge politicians on their primary motive because they all have the same primary motive (get elected) otherwise they'd never be elected. The secondary motives are the ones that separate them. Too bad Bush has the destruction of the American way of life as a secondary motive, isn't it?