Equivalent resistance & current

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a loop circuit with an initial current of 3A through a resistor R1, which decreases to 1.6A when an additional resistor R2 of 2 ohms is added in series. Participants are exploring the relationship between current, resistance, and voltage in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to establish equations based on Ohm's law to find the value of R1, questioning the validity of their logic and calculations. Some participants point out potential errors in the algebraic manipulation of the equations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, with one providing a corrected approach to the algebra involved. There is a sense of collaborative exploration, as different methods are being discussed without a clear consensus on the final value of R1.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of the problem statement and are focused on ensuring the correct application of Ohm's law and algebraic principles. There is an emphasis on verifying calculations and interpretations of the circuit behavior.

pattiecake
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
ok, so the problem states: the current in a loop circuit that has a resistance of R1 is 3A. The current is reduced to 1.6A when an additional resistor R2=2ohms is added in series with R1. What is the value of R1?

I drew two diagrams. My logic was that the voltage would be the same, b/c the voltage is supplied by the battery which does not change. Thus you have V=I1R1 for the first scenario; and you have V=I2(R1+R2). Since V is the same, you can set the two equations equal to each other, and solve for R1.

Is the logic right so far? If so, maybe I just have an algebratic error...

(3A)R1=(1.6A)(R1+2ohms)
(3/1.6)=(R+2)/R
1.875=1+R/2
.875=R/2
R=1.75 ohms?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That is almost correct, you made a mistake here:
[tex]\frac{3}{1.6} = \frac{R+2}{R}[/tex]
Needs to become:
[tex]1.875 = 1 + \frac{2}{R}[/tex]
 
I get R1 = 2.285 from breaking that down 2 different ways.

[tex](3)(R_1) = (1.6)(R_1 + 2)[/tex]

[tex]3R_1 = 1.6R_1 + 3.2[/tex]

[tex]1.4R_1 = 3.2[/tex]

[tex]R_1 = 2.285[/tex]



[tex](3)(R_1) = (1.6)(R_1 + 2)[/tex]

[tex]\frac{3}{1.6} = \frac{R_1 + 2}{R_1}[/tex]

[tex]1.875 = 1 + \frac{2}{R_1}[/tex]

[tex]0.875 = \frac{2}{R_1}[/tex]

[tex]R_1 = \frac{2}{0.875}[/tex]

[tex]R_1 = 2.285[/tex]
 
thank you! thank you! thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K