What do you think of these two books about Geometry?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter folksong
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Books Geometry
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around two books on geometry: "Modern Geometry-Methods and Applications" by A.T. Fomenko and S.P. Novikov, and "Principles of Algebraic Geometry" by Phillip Griffiths and Joseph Harris. Participants explore the differences between these texts and their suitability for physicists, focusing on their content and applications in physics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that Fomenko and Novikov's book is more accessible and useful for physicists, covering geometry and topology of smooth manifolds from both differential and algebraic viewpoints.
  • Others argue that Griffiths and Harris's book, while a standard reference in algebraic geometry, focuses on complex manifolds and may be less applicable to physics, particularly in areas like string theory.
  • One participant notes that algebraic geometry can handle singularities that are not permitted in manifold theory, indicating a distinction in the types of mathematical objects each book addresses.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the utility of each book for physicists, with no consensus on which is definitively more suitable.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the specific applications of each book in physics and the extent to which their content overlaps or diverges in terms of usefulness for different areas of study.

folksong
What do you think of these two books about Geometry??

1. A.T. Fomenko, S.P. Novikov, Modern Geometry-Methods and Applications PartI,II,III
2. Phillip Griffiths ,Joseph Harris , Principles of Algebraic Geometry

What's the main difference between these two books?
Which one is more suitable for a physicist?
Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
(1) A.T. Fomenko, S.P. Novikov, Modern Geometry-Methods and Applications PartI,II,III

These survey the geometry and topology of smooth manifolds from both the differential and algebraic viewpoints, and in a language and using examples that make it especially accessible and useful for physicists, and certainly more useful than...

(2) Phillip Griffiths ,Joseph Harris , Principles of Algebraic Geometry

This covers algebraic geometry from the standpoint of complex manifolds (as opposed to the more abstract but more general algebraic perspective, which at this point appears to be of little use in physics, including in string theory) and is still the standard reference in the field.

At this point, (1) is much more useful for a physicist than (2).
 
Algebraic geometry allows the mathematical objects that have isolated, and sometimes not so isolated, singularities, which are forbidden from manifold theory, the thrust of differential geometry.
 
What do you think of these two books about Geometry??

1. A.T. Fomenko, S.P. Novikov, Modern Geometry-Methods and Applications PartI,II,III
2. Phillip Griffiths ,Joseph Harris , Principles of Algebraic Geometry

What's the main difference between these two books?
Which one is more suitable for a physicist?
Thanks!
 
Have you asked this enough times, yet?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
14K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
9K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K