PDA

View Full Version : Time Evolution of the Gaussian packet


ehrenfest
Jul14-07, 10:46 PM
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
Can someone give me a general idea (I do not need and probably will not understand the rigorous mathematics) of how you can use the propagator equation

\psi(x,t) = \int{U(x,t;x',t')\psi(x',t')dx'},

the equation for a Gaussian wave packet,

\psi(x',0)= e^{i p_0 x'/\hbar}\frac{e^-x'^2/2\Delta^2}{(\pi\Delta^2)^{1/4}},

to arrive at the equation \psi(x,t) = [\pi^{1/2}(\Delta+\frac{i +\hbar t}{m\Delta})]^{-1/2}

exp{\frac{-(x-p_0 t/m)^2}{2\Delta^2(1+i \hbar t/m \Delta^2}}

X exp[\frac{i p_0}{\hbar}(x - \frac{p_0 t}{2m}) ]

Is this just a really complicated integration method? Is that a cross product or multiplcation? If it is a cross product how does come in? See Shankar 154 for more context.




2. Relevant equations



3. The attempt at a solution
I really do not know of any integration methods that give a cross product so I don't know. Just a general explanation would be helpfull.

olgranpappy
Jul14-07, 11:28 PM
If the propagator "U" is the free propagator then you can actually just write it down explicity and then you just have to do a gaussian integral to get the result. If "U" is the propagator for almost any other system the problem gets hella harder.


The "X" is not a "cross product." how could it be a cross product!?... there are no vectors!

ehrenfest
Jul15-07, 12:26 AM
You're right about the cross-product. Then I have no idea why the author used an X instead of a dot for multiplication. It is actually a free propagator. So that is just the result of the Gaussian integral with the propagator and the initial psi...I see.