The Scientist - Minding the genome gap

  • Thread starter Thread starter iansmith
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gap Scientist
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Human Genome Meeting highlighted significant gaps in our understanding of human genetics, emphasizing the need to focus on phenotypic differences rather than solely on disease genotypes. Leena Peltonen from the University of Helsinki and HUGO President Yoshiyuki Sakaki underscored the complexity of genomic function and the importance of addressing fundamental questions about human variation. Maynard Olson from the University of Washington warned that neglecting these aspects could jeopardize the future of genomics, advocating for a balanced approach that includes ethical considerations and societal trust in genetic research.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of human genetics and genomics
  • Familiarity with ethical implications in genetic research
  • Knowledge of phenotypic variation and its genetic basis
  • Awareness of funding challenges in nonmedical genetic research
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the role of phenotypic variation in human genetics
  • Explore ethical frameworks in genetic research
  • Investigate funding opportunities for nonmedical genetic studies
  • Learn about public engagement strategies in genomics
USEFUL FOR

Geneticists, researchers in genomics, ethicists, and policymakers interested in the broader implications of genetic research and its societal impact.

iansmith
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,317
Reaction score
2
HUGO conference opens with plea to refocus efforts on differences, not disease genotypes | By Stephen Pincock

BERLIN—Roughly a year after the human genome sequence was completed, scientists meeting at the opening of the Human Genome Meeting on Sunday (April 4) were reminded about the enormous gaps that remain in our understanding of our genetic makeup.

“We have the sequence of 100 species or so a click away on the Web… but how do we use that information? How can we address the complexity of disease background at the DNA level?” asked Leena Peltonen, from the University of Helsinki in Finland. “We shouldn't be unrealistically optimistic.”

“We are still not sure what is the best way to understand the function of the genome,” Human Genome Organisation (HUGO) President Yoshiyuki Sakaki told the opening session. Maynard Olson from the University of Washington, added, “The future of genomics is a really big topic.”

Olson said that future may be in peril unless the scientific establishment focuses on a fundamental aspect of human genetics that has been overlooked: how the most obvious differences among individuals—like hair color, height, weight, and handedness—are generated.

“It's truly striking… how little we know about these obvious questions that even a child would ask,” Olson said. “Why have geneticists ignored this question of why humans vary from one another in these ways?” he asked. It has been ignored partly because of the complexity of the issue, the difficulty of getting funds for nonmedical research, and “the long shadow of eugenics,” Olson said. “Our obsessive focus on disease genotypes is premature… My broader agenda is essential for longer-term benefits.”

“Its going to take all of our efforts… to develop the level of trust with society that would make it acceptable to study this subject that is essential to human genomics,” Olson said. Difficult as these ethical issues are, mainstream science needs to focus on them, rather than leave it to rogue elements, he said. “Are we prepared to bring to bear the value systems of the science establishment to bear on these questions or are we going to engage in a long guerrilla war with fringe elements?” he asked.

http://www.biomedcentral.com/news/20040405/03
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Biology news on Phys.org
..peltonen :) it's nice to see her name popping up again.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
10K