Need help with projectile motion problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves projectile motion, specifically analyzing the trajectory of a ball thrown upward at an angle from a horizontal plane, which strikes a wall perpendicularly at a height of 4.9 meters, located 10 meters away. Participants are exploring the implications of the given conditions and the relationships between the various parameters involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of the ball striking the wall perpendicularly and question how this relates to the vertical velocity being zero at that point. There is exploration of the relationship between height, time, and initial velocity, with some suggesting that the height of 4.9 meters is significant in determining the initial conditions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing hints and exploring different interpretations of the problem. Some have suggested focusing on the vertical motion and the time it takes to reach maximum height, while others are questioning the assumptions made about the initial velocity and angle. There is no explicit consensus, but various productive lines of reasoning are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem may be contrived due to the specific values given, particularly the height and distance, which may lead to unique solutions. There is also mention of the challenge in achieving a perpendicular strike on the wall, suggesting that the conditions may not be typical for projectile motion problems.

redshift
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Hi there,
I'd really, REALLY appreciate a hint for solving the following projectile motion problem.
"A ball is thrown upward at an angle from a point on a horizontal plane. 10 meters away from that point is a wall. The ball strikes the wall perpendicularly at a height of 4.9 meters. (1) Determine the time from throwing the ball to it hitting the wall. (2) Determine the speed at which it hit the wall. (3) Determine the initial velocity."

I can't get a handle on this because the initial velocity/angle isn't given. If the ball strikes perpendicularly, that means it's at the top of the trajectory and Vy, or the upward velocity of the projectile, will be 0.0 m/s. Does that sound right? Where do go from here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
what goes up must come down

redshift said:
I can't get a handle on this because the initial velocity/angle isn't given.
If they don't give it, that generally means you don't need it. (Or that you can figure it out.)
If the ball strikes perpendicularly, that means it's at the top of the trajectory and Vy, or the upward velocity of the projectile, will be 0.0 m/s. Does that sound right? Where do go from here?
Right! Now think about the motion in the y-direction only. If you toss a ball up, and it reaches a maximum height, how long does it take to do it? If that puzzles you, what about the reverse problem: If you drop a ball from a certain height, how long does it take to fall? Get the connection?
 
Oh! I kind of know this kind of problem! That 4.9 m business, that's how far something falls in one second with the gravitational constant of 9.8m/s/s. What goes up, must come down, so was it going maybe 10 m/s or something? It went 10 meters in one second?
 
holly said:
Oh! I kind of know this kind of problem! That 4.9 m business, that's how far something falls in one second with the gravitational constant of 9.8m/s/s.
Go, Holly! Absolutely correct.
What goes up, must come down, so was it going maybe 10 m/s or something?
Right again. V = gt = 9.8 m/s. That's the ball's initial speed in the y-direction.
It went 10 meters in one second?
Oops. It went 4.9 meters in one second. Remember? :wink:

The 9.8 m/s is the ball's instantaneous speed (in the y-direction) at the moment it is thrown. The average speed (in the y-direction) as it goes up to its maximum height is 4.9 m/s. Got it?
 
Got it! (slaps his forehead). I kept thinkingi that i couldn't use "y = v(initial y) x t + 0.5 x g x t(squared)" because i didn't know v(initial y) and t. Now i see that the vertical height of 4.9 m is not just any height, but a very special one in this case, in the sense that only one v(initial y) could achieve it. Thanx
 
Projectile motion

This problem is, unfortunately, contrived because of the special values used for the numerical properties. Here is how you solve ANY simple projectile motion problem.

While the value of the initial speed and angle are not given, we know that they must have definite values. So call them [tex]v_0[/tex] and [tex]\theta[\tex] and pretend you know them.<br /> <br /> Now, picture a fluorescent light fixture that hangs over the entire system, shining down. The light will cast a shadow of the ball on the ground, right? What is the motion of this shadow?<br /> <br /> Well, the shadow will move across the ground at constant speed for 10 meters. How fast does this shadow travel? That's easy, [tex]v_x = v_0\cos\theta[/tex]. Since the shadow moves across at constant speed, its distance/velocity/time relationship is simply<br /> <br /> [tex]10 = (v_0\cos\theta)t[/tex]<br /> <br /> Now, pretend you can cast a vertical fluorescent light on the ball, printing an image of its shadow on a wall. This shadow is like an object in free fall. It travels initially upwards at a speed [tex]v_{oy} = v_0 \sin\theta[/tex], but slows at a rate of [tex]g = 9.8[/tex] (in SI units). Its equation of motion must therefore be<br /> <br /> [tex]4.9 = (v_0\cos\theta)t + \frac{1}{2}(-9.8) t^2[/tex]<br /> <br /> Now we know one more bit of information about the system -- its final velocity in the vertical direction is 0. Using the second equation of motion we get<br /> <br /> [tex]0 = 4.9 + (-9.8)t[/tex]<br /> <br /> Three equations, three unknowns. The time from the last equation must be [tex]t = 0.5[/tex] seconds. Substitute this value into the first two equations and solve the resulting two equations, two unknowns. <br /> <br /> The beauty is this procedure will solve any simple projectile motion problem a science prof can throw at you.[/tex]
 
Projectile motion

This problem is, unfortunately, contrived because of the special values used for the numerical properties. Here is how you solve ANY simple projectile motion problem.

While the value of the initial speed and angle are not given, we know that they must have definite values. So call them [tex]v_0[/tex] and [tex]\theta[/tex] and pretend you know them.

Now, picture a fluorescent light fixture that hangs over the entire system, shining down. The light will cast a shadow of the ball on the ground, right? What is the motion of this shadow?

Well, the shadow will move across the ground at constant speed for 10 meters. How fast does this shadow travel? That's easy, [tex]v_x = v_0\cos\theta[/tex]. Since the shadow moves across at constant speed, its distance/velocity/time relationship is simply

[tex]10 = (v_0\cos\theta)t[/tex]

Now, pretend you can cast a vertical fluorescent light on the ball, printing an image of its shadow on a wall. This shadow is like an object in free fall. It travels initially upwards at a speed [tex]v_{oy} = v_0 \sin\theta[/tex], but slows at a rate of [tex]g = 9.8[/tex] (in SI units). Its equation of motion for displacement, [tex]\vec{d} = \vec{v}_0t + \frac{1}{2}\vec{a}t^2[/tex], must therefore be

[tex]4.9 = (v_0\cos\theta)t + \frac{1}{2}(-9.8) t^2[/tex]

Now we know one more bit of information about the system -- its final velocity in the vertical direction is 0. Using the equation of motion for velocity [tex]\vec{v} = \vec{v}_0 + \vec{a}t[/tex] we get

[tex]0 = 4.9 + (-9.8)t[/tex]

Three equations, three unknowns. The time from the last equation must be [tex]t = 0.5[/tex] seconds. Substitute this value into the first two equations and solve the resulting two equations, two unknowns.

The beauty is this procedure will solve any simple projectile motion problem a science prof can throw at you.
 
Last edited:
Question:
Regarding [tex]10 = (v_0\cos\theta)t[/tex]
Although we know that the shadow has moved 10 meters, how do we know from the start that it is moving across the ground at 10 m/sec? Did you skip a step?
 
JohnDubYa said:
This problem is, unfortunately, contrived because of the special values used for the numerical properties.
The only thing contrived about this problem is that the ball hits the wall perpendicularly. (Lot's of luck getting that to happen. :smile: ) But the height is arbitrary--- if it was 8.3m instead of 4.9m, you'd solve it the same way. Of course you wouldn't get a neat answer of 1 second. (So I guess that's contrived. But it doesn't change how you solve it.)
 
  • #10
The shadow does not move across the ground at 10 m/s, but at [tex]v_o\cos\theta[/tex] m/s.

The original speed of the object is denoted [tex]v_0[/tex]. The speed of the shadow on the ground is the horizontal component of the initial velocity vector, which is [tex]v_0\cos\theta[/tex].

That is why [tex]10=v_0\cos\theta[/tex], because the equation of motion for distance is [tex]d = vt[/tex] when the velocity is constant.
 
  • #11
RE: "Well, the shadow will move across the ground at constant speed for 10 meters"

I think you misread my statement. I did not say that the speed was 10 meters/second.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K