Electric Pot. Zero: Potential Energy Homework

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the position on the x-axis where the electric potential is zero due to two point charges, q1 = +7.00 nC and q2 = -5.00 nC, separated by a distance of 25.0 cm. The correct approach involves using the formula kq1/d1 = -kq2/d2, where d1 and d2 represent the distances from the point of interest to each charge. The confusion arises from the choice of distance variables, specifically why d is represented as d-25 when calculating the potential due to q2. The solution confirms that the distances must be defined relative to the positions of the charges.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric potential and point charges
  • Familiarity with Coulomb's law and the constant k
  • Knowledge of algebraic manipulation of equations
  • Concept of absolute values in distance calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of electric potential due to point charges
  • Learn about the concept of electric field and its relation to potential
  • Explore the application of Coulomb's law in complex charge configurations
  • Investigate the use of calculus in determining electric potential in continuous charge distributions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying electromagnetism, physics educators, and anyone seeking to understand electric potential calculations involving multiple point charges.

unhip_crayon
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Two point charges are arranged as shown on the x axis. q1 = +7.00 nC,
and q2 = −5.00 nC. a = 25.0 cm.
Calculate the position on the x axis, outside of the charges, where the
electric potential is zero

|...a...|
O----------O
q1.....q2(ignore the periods)

The Attempt at a Solution



V=V1+V1

kq1/d = -kq2/d

k(7nC)/d = -k(-5nC)/(d-25)

then solve.

I get the correct answer but my question is, why is it d-25 and why is it under q2? My first approach I had.

k(7nC)/(d+25) = -k(-5nC)/d
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends on what d is. your first approach used d as the distance from q2, and the secontd approach used d as the distance from q1. And in the equation kq1/d = -kq2/d you use both at the same time. This should hae been kq_1/d_1 = -kq_2/d_2

I would have used x for the position of the point with zero potential, the positions of the charges are x_1 = 0, and x_2 = 25
would have d_1 = |x - x_1| and d_2 = |x - x_2| (|x| is the absolute value of x)
if you look for a point to the right of q_2 you can simply have
d_1 = x - x_1 = x
d_2 = x - x_2 = x - 25
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K