Quantum Mechanics: a non-normalizable state

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a quantum mechanics problem involving a non-normalizable wave function, specifically \(\Psi(x) = 1 + \sin^2(kx)\). The original poster seeks to determine the possible kinetic energy values and their associated probabilities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore expressing the non-normalizable state as a sum of states with definite momentum. There are attempts to calculate probabilities based on the normalized wave function derived from the original state.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide hints and corrections regarding the mathematical expressions used, particularly in the representation of the sine function. There is ongoing exploration of the normalization process and the implications for calculating probabilities related to kinetic energy.

Contextual Notes

Participants note issues with the normalization of the wave function and the implications of using a non-normalizable state in quantum mechanics. The discussion includes checking assumptions about the mathematical representations involved.

jalobo
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


At a given moment, the wave function of a particle is in a non-normalizable state [tex]\Psi[/tex](x) = 1 + sin²(kx). By measuring its kinetic energy, what values are possible and with what probability?.


Homework Equations




The Attempt at a Solution


I can't calculate the probability because the integral that define it is unbounded.
([tex]\Psi[/tex], [tex]\widehat{K}\Psi[/tex]) = [tex]\infty[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can express that state as a sum of states with definite momentum and hence definite energy. What are their relative amplitudes? Hint,
sin(kx)=(exp(ikx)-exp(-ikx))/2i.
 
Thanks Dick for your hint.

Here is what I did following your advice:

[tex]\Psi[/tex](x) = exp{i(2k)x} - [tex]\frac{1}{4}[/tex]exp{i(-2k)x} + (1+i)exp{i(0)x},

that is, I have expressed the wave function as a linear combination of self-states of the linear momentum.

So, we have:

[tex]\left\|\Psi\right\|[/tex]² = 1 + [tex]\frac{1}{16}[/tex]+2 [tex]\Rightarrow\left\|\Psi\right\|[/tex] = [tex]\frac{7}{4}[/tex]

and, using the same notation, the normalized wave function is

[tex]\Psi[/tex](x) = [tex]\frac{4}{7}[/tex] exp{i(2k)x} - [tex]\frac{1}{7}[/tex] exp{i(-2k)x} + [tex]\left(\frac{4}{7} + \frac{4}{7} i \right)[/tex] exp{i(0)x}.

Hence,


Pr([tex]p_{x}[/tex] = 2k) = [tex]\frac{16}{49}[/tex],

Pr([tex]p_{x}[/tex] = -2k) = [tex]\frac{1}{49}[/tex],

Pr([tex]p_{x}[/tex] = 0) = [tex]\frac{32}{49}[/tex],

and therefore, denoting the kinetic energy by T, we finally have:

Pr(T = 2k²/2m) = [tex]\frac{17}{49}[/tex],

Pr(T = 0) = [tex]\frac{32}{49}[/tex],

as the kinetic energy is related to linear momentum through the expression

T = [tex]\frac{p^{2}_{x}}{2m}[/tex].

Is it right?.
 
Something went wrong with the very first line. I don't see how e^(2ikx) and e^(-2ikx) can have different coefficients. Did you miss a bracket in
sin(kx)=[exp(ikx)-exp(-ikx)]/(2i)? Your general approach is right, though.
 
Oh, yes, I missed a bracket in sin(kx)=[exp(ikx)-exp(-ikx)]/(2i). Thank you very much.

Let's see if now is entirely correct.

Taking into account the identity sin(kx) = [tex]\frac{exp(ikx)-exp(-ikx)}{2i}[/tex],

the non-normalizable wave function [tex]\Psi (x)[/tex] = 1 + sin²(x) can be expressed as a linear combination of self-states of the linear momentum,

[tex]\Psi (x)[/tex] = [tex]\frac{3}{2}[/tex] exp{i(0)x} - [tex]\frac{1}{4}[/tex] exp{i(2k)x} - [tex]\frac{1}{4}[/tex] exp{i(-2k)x},

So, we have:

[tex]\left\|\Psi\right\|[/tex]² = [tex]\frac{19}{8}\Rightarrow\left\|\Psi\right\|[/tex] = [tex]\frac{\sqrt{38}}{4}[/tex]

and the normalized wave function, using the same notation, is

[tex]\Psi[/tex](x) = [tex]\frac{6}{\sqrt{38}}[/tex] exp{i(0k)x} - [tex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{38}}[/tex] exp{i(2k)x} - [tex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{38}}[/tex] exp{i(-2k)x}

Thus, by measuring the observable linear momentum, the only possible values are those relating to these three self-states of the linear momentum, because in the process of measuring the wave function is projected onto one of these (collapse or reduction of the state), and the probabilities for each value of the linear momentum is given by the square of the amplitude of the corresponding self-functions.

Hence,

Pr([tex]p_{x} = 0)[/tex] = [tex]\frac{36}{38}[/tex],

Pr([tex]p_{x} = 2k)[/tex] = [tex]\frac{1}{38}[/tex],

Pr([tex]p_{x} = -2k)[/tex] = [tex]\frac{1}{38}[/tex],

and therefore, denoting the kinetic energy by T, we finally have:

Pr(T = 0) = [tex]\frac{18}{19}[/tex],

Pr(T = 2k²/m) = [tex]\frac{1}{19}[/tex],

as the kinetic energy is related to linear momentum through the expression

T = [tex]\frac{p^{2}_{x}}{2m}[/tex].

Thanks in advance.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K