Am I right or is my book right (Taylor remainder)

[viciousp]

1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
The approximation e^{x}=1+x+(x^{2}/2) is used when X is small estimate the error when \left|x \right|<0.1


2. Relevant equations
\left|R_{n} \right|<\frac{M(x-a)^{n+1}}{(n+1)!}


3. The attempt at a solution
Since the Taylor expansion goes to the second power I used the third derivative of e^{x} which is just its self and found the maximum value that it can be between the domain [0,0.1] which is at e^{0.1} then continuing the formula (0.1-0)^{3} then i divided it by 3! which gave me an answer of 1.84*10^{-4}.

My book on the other hand used 3^{0.1} instead of e^{0.1} and as a result the answer in the book was larger than my answer. So which answer is the right answer?

[HallsofIvy]

Depends upon what you mean by "estimate". Remember that neither of those answers will be the error- you can't determine the exact error this way. What you are saying is that the error is less than 1.98x10-4 while the text book is saying it is less than a larger value (because e< 3) so both are correct. I don't know if your book has some reason for using "3" rather than "e". e gives a slightly more accurate estimate but they are both estimates.

[cellotim]

The only reason I can imagine is that 3^{0.1} is easier to calculate because it's the solution of x^{10} = 3 and a Newton's method iteration would provide an accurate estimation quickly. The assumption, I suppose, is that if you are approximating e^x , you don't have the luxury of calculating it explicitly.