Absolute Converge test for 1/[n*ln(n)]

  • Thread starter Thread starter donald1403
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Absolute Test
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the convergence of the series ∑(1/(n*ln(n))) from n=2 to infinity. The ratio test was initially applied, but it yielded a limit of 1, making it inconclusive. Participants suggested using the limit comparison test with potential terms like 1/n or 1/ln(n), but concerns arose about determining the original series' behavior. The integral test was also recommended, leading to an antiderivative of ln(ln(n)), which requires evaluating its limit as n approaches infinity. Clarification was sought regarding absolute versus conditional convergence, particularly in relation to alternating series.
donald1403
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



<br /> \sum_{n = 2}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n*ln(n)}<br />

I have to find whether the series absolute converge, conditionally converge or diverge?2. The attempt at a solution

I used the ratio test.

so, lim(n to infinity) [n*ln(n)]/[(n+1)*ln(n+1)]

since ln (n+1) will be greater than ln (n) and n+1 will be greater than n, the whole denominator will be greater than the numerator so when i take the limit, the value must be less than 1.

but i think i have cancel n or ln(n) to show that the whole limit is really less than 1 to converge.

help!

i m sorry . i dun know how to use the latex code..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, the limit is 1 even though each \frac{n \ln n}{(n + 1) \ln (n + 1)} &lt; 1, because \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{n}{n + 1} = \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{1}{1 + \frac{1}{n}} = 1 and \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{\ln n}{\ln (n + 1)} = 1 by l'hopital's rule.

Since the limit is 1, the ratio test is inconclusive. Do you have any other methods to use?
 
i think i can use "limit comparison test" but i m not sure what i should use for bn.

if i use either 1/n or 1/ln(n) for bn, the limit goes to zero and since bn diverge, i can't decide on an(original term).

one more questions abt absolute convergence test. assuming the series is given, not alternative series, if i use one of the test n find out , it is divergent. it is divergent. rt?
i am confused with when i have to test for conditional convergence. is it only for alternate series.
all the examples in the textbook which turn out to be conditional convergence are alternate series..

sorry for asking too many questions in one post.
 
Use an integral test:
\int 1 / (n*ln|n|)
A certain substitution should eventually lead to an antiderivative of:
ln(ln(n))

I'll leave the rest to you (remember to look at what lim n->inf: ln(ln(n)) does)
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K