Absolute Converge test for 1/[n*ln(n)]

  • Thread starter Thread starter donald1403
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Absolute Test
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The series \sum_{n = 2}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n \ln(n)} is analyzed for absolute convergence, conditional convergence, or divergence. The ratio test is applied, yielding a limit of 1, which renders the test inconclusive. The limit comparison test is suggested, but confusion arises regarding the choice of comparison series. The integral test is also recommended, leading to the evaluation of \int \frac{1}{n \ln|n|} and its antiderivative ln(ln(n)).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of series convergence tests, specifically the ratio test and limit comparison test.
  • Familiarity with L'Hôpital's rule for evaluating limits.
  • Knowledge of integral tests for series convergence.
  • Basic proficiency in LaTeX for mathematical notation.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Limit Comparison Test in detail to understand its application and selection of comparison series.
  • Learn about the Integral Test and its conditions for convergence.
  • Explore the concept of absolute and conditional convergence, particularly in the context of non-alternating series.
  • Review examples of series that exhibit conditional convergence to clarify when to apply relevant tests.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on series convergence, mathematicians, and educators looking to clarify concepts of convergence tests.

donald1403
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



<br /> \sum_{n = 2}^{\infty} \frac{1}{n*ln(n)}<br />

I have to find whether the series absolute converge, conditionally converge or diverge?2. The attempt at a solution

I used the ratio test.

so, lim(n to infinity) [n*ln(n)]/[(n+1)*ln(n+1)]

since ln (n+1) will be greater than ln (n) and n+1 will be greater than n, the whole denominator will be greater than the numerator so when i take the limit, the value must be less than 1.

but i think i have cancel n or ln(n) to show that the whole limit is really less than 1 to converge.

help!

i m sorry . i dun know how to use the latex code..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, the limit is 1 even though each \frac{n \ln n}{(n + 1) \ln (n + 1)} &lt; 1, because \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{n}{n + 1} = \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{1}{1 + \frac{1}{n}} = 1 and \lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{\ln n}{\ln (n + 1)} = 1 by l'hopital's rule.

Since the limit is 1, the ratio test is inconclusive. Do you have any other methods to use?
 
i think i can use "limit comparison test" but i m not sure what i should use for bn.

if i use either 1/n or 1/ln(n) for bn, the limit goes to zero and since bn diverge, i can't decide on an(original term).

one more questions abt absolute convergence test. assuming the series is given, not alternative series, if i use one of the test n find out , it is divergent. it is divergent. rt?
i am confused with when i have to test for conditional convergence. is it only for alternate series.
all the examples in the textbook which turn out to be conditional convergence are alternate series..

sorry for asking too many questions in one post.
 
Use an integral test:
\int 1 / (n*ln|n|)
A certain substitution should eventually lead to an antiderivative of:
ln(ln(n))

I'll leave the rest to you (remember to look at what lim n->inf: ln(ln(n)) does)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K