Stuck on conservation of energy problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a collision between a mass of clay and a board attached to a spring on a frictionless surface, focusing on the conservation of energy and momentum principles to determine the compression of the spring after the collision.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the kinetic energy of the clay and the potential energy of the spring, questioning the definitions and assumptions related to energy conservation and momentum during the collision.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on using conservation of momentum for the collision and then applying energy principles to find the spring compression. There are multiple interpretations of the energy conservation approach, and some participants are exploring the relationship between kinetic and potential energy in this context.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through the complexities of inelastic collisions and the application of the work-energy theorem, with some confusion regarding the definitions of potential energy in the context of the problem.

redshift
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
"On a frictionless, horizontal surface there is a spring with one end fixed and the other attached to a board of mass 1 kg. The spring coefficient is 150 N/m. 500g of clay moving at 3.0 m/s on this horizontal surface collides squarely with the board. As a result, the board and clay stick together, and the spring is compressed. Determine by how much the spring has shortened."

Since the clay sticks to the board, the coefficient of restitution is probably 0. The kinetic energy of the clay prior to collision is 1/2(500g)9=2.25 J while its potential energy is (I think) 0. The potential and kinetic energy of the spring prior to collision are both 0.
I'd appreciate a hint on how to start.
Many thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"The kinetic energy of the clay prior to collision is 1/2(500g)9=2.25 J while its potential energy is (I think) 0."

Be careful with your thinking; potential energy is a quantity that can ONLY be shared by two bodies. Clay by itself cannot have a potential energy.


Since this is an inelastic collision, you cannot use energy methods throughout the duration of the collision, and must resort to conservation of momentum instead. Make your system the board and the clay for the purpose of conserving momentum before and after contact. This will give you the velocity of the board, clay system after contact. AFTER the collision you can start thinking energy and simply use the work energy theorem to calculate the compression of the spring. I don't know if you've gotten to the ballistic pendulum problem yet, but this problem is pretty much analogous. This should help get you started; try it out and if you get stuck again, i'd be happy to help you work through it in more detail.
 
Gza said:
"you...must resort to conservation of momentum instead.
So, if the momentum of the clay is mv= 0.5kg(3 m/s)=1.5 kg/ms, do you mean that all this energy will be conserved by the spring?

Gza said:
AFTER the collision you can start thinking energy and simply use the work energy theorem to calculate the compression of the spring.
What exactly is the work energy theorem?

Thanks
 
Did some more reading.
Since this is a conservation of energy problem, E(initial) = E(final)
Now, E(initial) is the kinetic energy of the clay 1/2mv^2 = (1/2)(.5kg)(3m/s)^2 = 2.25 J
E(final) is the potential energy stored in the compressed spring 1/2kx^2 = 1/2(150)x^2
Therefore... 2.25 = 75x^2
solving for x gives 0.173 cm

Does this look right?
 
Just realized I forgot about the board. So since, as Gza said, momentum is concerved here, p(initial) = p(final)
so, (0.5)3 = (1 + 0.5)V'
Solving for v' gives 1 m/s (the velocity of the clay/board system)
Plugging this into E(initial) = E(final) gives
1/2mv^2 = 1/2kx^2
x = 0.1 meter
That looks better!
 
That's correct. I would recommend studying up on the work energy theorem:
[tex]W_{ext} = \Delta E[/tex]; since the conservation of energy equation you used in your solution is simply a consequence of this theorem when the external work is zero. Understanding it is powerful in regards to solving problems where the energy may not be conserved (ie: problems involving friction.)
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
55
Views
7K