PDA

View Full Version : shocked by a Ramanujan identity


zetafunction
Apr14-09, 04:38 PM
i do not remember the webpage i watched this but i remember that they said ' IN chapter 1 of his notebook Ramanujan wrote '

\sum_{n=0}^{x}n^{r}= (r+1)^{-1}x^{r+1}+ \zeta (-r) - \sum_{k}B_{2k}\frac{\Gamma (r+1)}{\Gamma (k-2r+2)}

does anyone knows how to get this ??

ramsey2879
Apr14-09, 09:07 PM
i do not remember the webpage i watched this but i remember that they said ' IN chapter 1 of his notebook Ramanujan wrote '

\sum_{n=0}^{x}n^{r}= (r+1)^{-1}x^{r+1}+ \zeta (-r) - \sum_{k}B_{2k}\frac{\Gamma (r+1)}{\Gamma (k-2r+2)}

does anyone knows how to get this ??

To begin with, what is B? and in the sum what is the range of k?

CRGreathouse
Apr14-09, 10:42 PM
To begin with, what is B? and in the sum what is the range of k?

A Bernoulli number and "0 to infinity", I believe.

zetafunction
Apr15-09, 07:35 AM
oh, excuse me the lack of notation

here B_2k means the 2k-th Bernoulli Number, and yes the summation (is finite) goes to k=0 to k= infinite

i know he used Euler-Maclaurin summation formula but the term \zeta (-r) seems strange to me

damo_clark
Apr18-09, 02:54 AM
The "Euler Summation Formula" might give you some insight to why the Bernouli numbers pop up in this formula. The term \zeta (-r) is just \frac{B_{r+1}}{r+1} for a positive integer value of r. Another formula that will compute this sum for a positive integer value of r is :



f_{r}(x)= \sum_{n=0} ^{x} n^{r} = r\int f_{r-1}dx + xB_{r}

where

f_{1}(x)=\frac{x^2}{2} + \frac{x}{2}



I think one of the Bernoulli brothers could calculate 1^{10}+2^{10}+3^{10} + .... 1000^{10} in about fifteen minutes using one of these formulas. Try it using just pen and paper and see how long it takes you...