Prove: A mapping f:S->T is bijective if and only if it has an inverse?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mruncleramos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse Mapping
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of mappings, specifically addressing the conditions under which a mapping f: S -> T is bijective and the implications of having an inverse. Participants explore definitions, proofs, and examples related to functions, injectivity, surjectivity, and the concept of cardinality.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that a mapping (function) cannot associate an element of S with multiple elements of T, as this contradicts the definition of a function.
  • One participant provides a proof structure showing that if f is bijective, it has an inverse, and conversely, if f has an inverse, it is bijective, detailing the definitions of injectivity and surjectivity.
  • Another participant introduces a discussion on cardinalities, using examples from discrete mathematics and computer science to illustrate differences in set properties and mapping outcomes.
  • There is a correction regarding the definition of sets, emphasizing that sets cannot contain duplicate elements, which leads to a clarification on the terminology used by another participant.
  • A later reply acknowledges poor wording and clarifies that the intention was to discuss cardinalities rather than the properties of sets.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the definition of a function and the implications of bijectivity and inverses, but there is some disagreement regarding the treatment of sets with duplicate elements and the interpretation of cardinalities.

Contextual Notes

Some statements rely on specific definitions of functions and sets, and there are unresolved aspects regarding the implications of cardinality in the context of mappings.

mruncleramos
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
Can a mapping from f:S->T associate an element of s into several elements of T? Also, how do you prove: A mapping f:S->T is bijective if and only if it has an inverse?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No. "mapping" is another word for "function". Part of the definition of function is that f(x) be a single value.

f:S-> T is bijective iplies f has an inverse:

Let y be any member of T. Since f is bijective it is both one-to-one (injective) and onto (surjective). Since f is surjective, there exist at least one member of S, x, such that f(x)= y. Since f is injective, there is only one such. Define g: T->S by g(y)= x.
Now show that that is a function and is the inverse of f.

f has an inverse implies f is bijective.

i) for any y in T, let x= f-1(y). Then, by definition of inverse, f(x)= y so f is surjective.

ii) suppose f(x1)= f(x2). Applying f-1 to both sides of the equation f-1(f(x1)= f-1(x2)
x1= x2
so f is injective.

Since f is both injective and surjective, it is bijective.
 
mruncleramos said:
Can a mapping from f:S->T associate an element of s into several elements of T? Also, how do you prove: A mapping f:S->T is bijective if and only if it has an inverse?

To take things into an account, I remember in discrete maths - a bit like computational mathematics or rather, it is computational mathematics - we define set |R| = |{1,1,1,1}| as 4. As there are four items in the set. Now, in the other extreme, let S = {1}, then |S| = |{1}| = 1. So in effect the sets R and S have different properties.

One other thing is that, once again, in computer science, R = {1,1,1,1} and S = {1} are two totally different sets. Let's map (+2) to both sides and find the total sum of all the elements in the sets, i.e., {sum (map (+2) R)} and {sum (map (+2) S)}.

sum (map (+2) R) = sum {3,3,3,3} = 12
sum (map (+2) S) = sum {1} = 1 /= 12 = sum (map (+2) R)
and as function applied two both sets are equal, R and S are not equal.

However, answering your question, even in computer science the values of each element after mapping only takes 1 value from the image. i.e., notice that (map (+2) R) = {3,3,3,3}. So 1 -> 3 by mapping. And each element valued 1, goes to exactly one value in the image of f, that is 3.

But as I said, this is in computer science and most of the computer applications - although duplicates are considered nasty in some cases.
 
Last edited:
The set {1,1,1,1} contains only one element. you aren't allowed to repeat elements in a set.
 
I meant cardinalities... yes my wordings were pretty poor.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K