What Are the Key Theories and Mathematics Behind Notable Phenomena in Physics?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Yousif
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on key theories and mathematical concepts in theoretical physics, specifically Newton's Corpuscular theory of light, Photoelectric Emission, CP violation, and Hadron spectroscopy. Newton's theory evolved from his work on particle kinetics, while the Photoelectric Effect was initially explored by Max Planck and later expanded by Albert Einstein, emphasizing the relationship between light frequency and emitted electron energy. The conversation highlights the need for resources to understand these phenomena and recommends foundational texts such as "The Search for Schrödinger's Cat" by John Gribbin and "Physics" by Paul Tipler for first-year theoretical physics students.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newtonian mechanics and particle kinetics
  • Familiarity with quantum mechanics concepts, particularly the Photoelectric Effect
  • Knowledge of statistical mechanics, specifically Boltzmann's methods
  • Basic principles of particle physics related to CP violation and hadron spectroscopy
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Newton's Corpuscular theory and its historical context in physics
  • Study the mathematical derivation of the Photoelectric Effect and its implications
  • Explore CP violation theories and the associated mathematical symmetries
  • Investigate Hadron spectroscopy techniques and their applications in particle physics
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for students pursuing theoretical physics, educators seeking teaching resources, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of key physical phenomena.

Yousif
Hellow everyone,
I've just sat my final A-level physics exam and next year its university for me, I'll be studying theoretical physics.

I am looking into the following phenomenae - in a tad more detail as curious general interest;

1. Newton's Corpuscular theory of light ( I know its not right but I'm interested on how he came up with it and the math he supported his theory with).
2. Photoelectric Emission (The kinetic energy of emitted electrons is dependent on the frequency of light and not intensity, experimentally has been proven, what's the mathematics and theory behind it?)
3. CP violation ( What are the theories and mathematical calculations used to determine the symmetries?)
4. Hadron specrtroscopy

I am interested in both the physics and the math associated with the phenomenae I have mentioned, I've been trying to look them up on the net however since its such a vast resource of info, one hardly finds what they want.

I would be extremely grateful if anyone here can give me resources, net based or books on how to proceed with finding more about what I have mentioned.

One last favour, can I have a list of reccomended books for first year theoretical physics courses so that I can have a good idea of what I'm going to explore next year.

Thanks a lot everyone.

Regards,
Yousif
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
1. Well... it wasn't really derived. It was a natural progression from Newton's work on particle kinetics to impose the same laws on light. This still allows refraction etc by changing the spell of corpuscles (only in the opposite way), and it had an advantage in being able to define sharp edges (wave theory was thought to lead to blurring at edges due to diffraction).

2. The work was done initially by max Planck, who derive by numerology an equation for black body decay (avoiding the old "ultraviolet catastrophe"), but could not find theoretical backing. By applying Boltzmann's statistical method with added discrete particles, he could derive his equation. He first proposed that this was due to quantisation of electron oscillators which create em waves. einstein worked on it and created a solution using quantised light wavepackets, and giving them each energy related to frequency, which also explained the photoelectric effect. This led to other conclusions and predictions which were later proven.

For a better explanation read say, Gribbin's "The Search for Schrödinger's Cat". Or just ask around here at PF.
 
Physics by Paul Tipler is a fairly standard 1st year physics textbook. Once you start getting to university, there is not much point in the popular science books other than to try to maintain interest in the subject and to see what the longer term material may be.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K