View Full Version : Maximum surface area of cylinder
songoku
Aug24-09, 06:34 AM
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
Given that a solid cylinder has a fixed volume V, prove that its total surface area S is minimum when its height and base diameter are equal.
2. Relevant equations
derivative
3. The attempt at a solution
I am able to prove that question.
V=\pi r^2 h
h=\frac{V}{\pi r^2}
So, to get minimum surface area:
\frac{dS}{dr}=0
\frac{d}{dr}(2\pi r h + 2 \pi r^2)=0
\frac{d}{dr}(2\pi r \frac{V}{\pi r^2} + 2 \pi r^2)=0
\frac{d}{dr}(2\frac{V}{r}+2 \pi r^2)=0
-2\frac{V}{r^2}+4\pi r=0
2\frac{V}{r^2}=4\pi r
2\frac{\pi r^2 h}{r^2}=4\pi r
h=d\; \text{(Shown)}
So,with h = d, the minimum surface area is :
S=2\pi r (2r) + 2\pi r^2
S=6\pi r^2
What I want to ask is : how about if the question asks to find the maximum surface area?
I think to find the maximum value, we also set \frac{dS}{dr}=0. From my work, I don't see any ways to find the maximum value...
Thanks
ideasrule
Aug24-09, 06:56 AM
There is no maximum surface area. If you examine the equation for S that you derived:
S=\(2\frac{V}{r}+2 \pi r^2
As r gets very big, S approaches infinity. Similarly, as r gets very small, S also approaches infinity.
To visualize this, if you squash the cylinder so that it has a tiny height, the bases can be expanded to keep the volume constant. Since the bases can be expanded to any size, the maximum surface area is infinite. If you squeeze the cylinder so that it has a tiny radius but large height, surface area would also increase, but it's a bit harder to see this intuitively.
tiny-tim
Aug24-09, 07:02 AM
What I want to ask is : how about if the question asks to find the maximum surface area?
I think to find the maximum value, we also set \frac{dS}{dr}=0. From my work, I don't see any ways to find the maximum value...
Thanks
Hi songoku! :smile:
Your proof is fine, but technically you haven't actually proved that r = d gives a minimum volume …
you've only proved that the volume has exactly one stationary value. :wink:
Now you must
i] show it's a minimum
ii] (to find the maxima) use the physical fact that d and h must both be greater than 0. :smile:
songoku
Aug25-09, 04:45 AM
Hi ideasrule and tiny-tim :)
You're right tiny-tim. Technically I haven't actually proved that h = d gives a minimum volume. I tried but not sure if it's right. I used second derivative test.
\frac{dS}{dr}=-2\frac{V}{r^2}+4\pi r
\frac{d^2S}{dr^2}=4\frac{V}{r^3}+4\pi
\frac{d^2S}{dr^2}=4\frac{\pi r^2h}{r^3}+4\pi
\frac{d^2S}{dr^2}=\frac{4\pi h}{r}+4\pi
For h = d :
\frac{d^2S}{dr^2}=12 \pi
Since \frac{d^2S}{dr^2}>0 , it's minimum value.
For maxima, I think ideasrule is right. But I don't know how to use the physical fact that d and h must both be greater than 0 to get maxima value. Is it the same as ideasrule's work?
Thanks :)
tiny-tim
Aug25-09, 05:00 AM
I used second derivative test.
\frac{dS}{dr}=-2\frac{V}{r^2}+4\pi r
\frac{d^2S}{dr^2}=4\frac{V}{r^3}+4\pi …
eugh! :yuck:
you should have stopped there! …
you don't need to know what d2S/dr2 is, you only need to know whether it's positive! …
and it always is, since V and r are always positive! :wink:
For maxima, I think ideasrule is right. But I don't know how to use the physical fact that d and h must both be greater than 0 to get maxima value. Is it the same as ideasrule's work?
Since d2S/dr2 > 0, it has only one minimum and no other turning-point for r > 0 …
so in the range r > 0, S has (or, rather, approaches) a maximum at the two end-points, 0 and ∞. :smile:
songoku
Aug25-09, 05:09 AM
Hi tiny-tim :wink:
Oh I get it. Great thanks for your help !!
And also thank you idearules. :smile:
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.