Borek
Sep28-09, 06:55 AM
It hit the news in a last few days, you have probably heard about it. That's what I have found about the trial:
New infections occurred in 51 of the 8,197 given vaccine and in 74 of the 8,198 who received dummy shots. That worked out to a 31 percent lower risk of infection for the vaccine group.
And it makes me wonder - what is statistical significance of this diference? What is a confidence level that those that were given vaccine were in fact more immune? Or in other words - what is a confidence level that probability of contracting AIDS was lower in those that received vaccine? (Sure, we have to assume both group were otherwise identical).
In theory I should know how to calculate it, but after 20 years of lying somewhere in the dark corner my statistics is so rusty I prefer not to touch it, as it may fall apart :grumpy:
New infections occurred in 51 of the 8,197 given vaccine and in 74 of the 8,198 who received dummy shots. That worked out to a 31 percent lower risk of infection for the vaccine group.
And it makes me wonder - what is statistical significance of this diference? What is a confidence level that those that were given vaccine were in fact more immune? Or in other words - what is a confidence level that probability of contracting AIDS was lower in those that received vaccine? (Sure, we have to assume both group were otherwise identical).
In theory I should know how to calculate it, but after 20 years of lying somewhere in the dark corner my statistics is so rusty I prefer not to touch it, as it may fall apart :grumpy: