View Full Version : Seeing Pluto
Loren Booda
Oct7-09, 12:33 AM
Stars twinkle because our atmosphere's turbulence causes these point-like bodies to scintillate, whereas planets supposedly appear large enough not to twinkle. Is Pluto (a distant and small planetoid) enough of a point to twinkle as seen from Earth?
DaveC426913
Oct7-09, 01:17 AM
Stars twinkle because our atmosphere's turbulence causes these point-like bodies to scintillate, whereas planets supposedly appear large enough not to twinkle. Is Pluto (a distant and small planetoid) enough of a point to twinkle as seen from Earth?
Pluto is not visible to the naked eye from Earth. At a mag of 13, it is orders of magnitude below naked eye visible (~6.6) and below any other stars you will see.
Loren Booda
Oct7-09, 01:34 PM
By "seeing" I was trying to refer to the term for atmospheric scintillation (twinkling), whether observed by telescope or naked eye. Let me rephrase: is it possible to encounter significant "twinkling" when observing Pluto from Earth?
russ_watters
Oct8-09, 12:08 AM
Yes: the more you magnify an object, the more atmospheric scintillation comes into play. And Pluto is so small, it would barely be more than a point of light in even a very large amateur telescope.
twofish-quant
Oct10-09, 12:02 AM
Here are some pictures of Pluto "twinkling"
http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu//full/1987A%26A...174..295B/0000297.000.html
What you can do with Pluto is to take lots of short observation of the planet twinkling, and then run them through some mathematics to get the shape of Pluto and its moon Charon.
Loren Booda
Oct10-09, 03:51 AM
Here are some pictures of Pluto "twinkling"
http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu//full/1987A%26A...174..295B/0000297.000.html
What you can do with Pluto is to take lots of short observation of the planet twinkling, and then run them through some mathematics to get the shape of Pluto and its moon Charon.Why does it appear that there are two images of Charon in the photos - is that due to diffraction?
mgb_phys
Oct10-09, 11:18 AM
Speckle is a technique where you take an image of the pupil plane (essentialy the fourier transform of the image) and then create an image by fitting an interative model to the data.
One of the side effects of the process is that you have a symmetric image because there aren't enough degrees of freedom in the data to decide which is correct.
Also the point of speckle is to remove atmopsheric twinkle effects - so it's a bit pointless in this discussion. Pluto would twinkle like a star through a telescope powerfull enough to see it. Planets don't twinkle because they are several times bigger than the size of the atmospheric distortion (1arc sec), pluto is smaller than this
russ_watters
Oct10-09, 01:02 PM
Planets don't twinkle because they are several times bigger than the size of the atmospheric distortion (1arc sec), pluto is smaller than this For everyone's info, that's probably a good number for an average day, but it can be worse or better, probably on a range of 0.1 to 2 arcsec 90% of the time.
The angular diameters of a few objects as viewed from Earth:
Andromeda Galaxy: 11,400 arcsec
Sun/Moon: 1,800 arcsec
Jupiter: 40 arcsec
Europa: 1.0 arcsec
Pluto: 0.10 arcsec (looked it up - that's actually bigger than I expected)
Betelgeus: 0.050 arcsec
Vanadium 50
Oct10-09, 03:22 PM
Russ, what's the star with the largest angular diameter as seen from earth? Gamma Crucis perhaps? It's rather large and quiet close.
mgb_phys
Oct10-09, 03:56 PM
In the northern hemisphere it's probably Betelgues. We took images of it using a speckle-like technique that resolve bright spots on the star
ideasrule
Oct10-09, 05:49 PM
In the southern hemisphere it's R Doradus, with an angular diameter of 0.06 arcsec. For many reasons, R Doradus is nowhere as interesting as Betelgeuse and is relatively obscure.
twofish-quant
Oct13-09, 07:06 PM
The mirror image comes as a result of the mathematics that the use to get the images from the speckles. Unfortunately, I'm not familiar enough with the math to know why that happens and would welcome someone that knows more about interferometry to chime in.
mgb_phys
Oct13-09, 08:20 PM
Basically because you don't have any information on the absolute phase so the reconstruction algorithm has two (- and +) solutions.
russ_watters
Oct13-09, 08:33 PM
Russ, what's the star with the largest angular diameter as seen from earth? Gamma Crucis perhaps? It's rather large and quiet close. Don't actually know, sorry - I just pulled a few out of the air, plus looked a wiki for the question.
vBulletin® v3.7.6, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.