View Full Version : Are sperm, phagocytes and other fauna produced by the human body considered protists
wasteofo2
Jul8-04, 11:18 PM
Just curious if things like sperm, phagocytes etc. were considered protists, and if not, what are they considered?
iansmith
Jul9-04, 09:27 AM
Protist are usually free living and can acquire or produces their food. It is a system be itself with the exception of some "multicellular" species.
Human cell could never be consider protist because most of the cells produce by the human body do not replicated and acquire, and produce food on their own. Stem cells and specific factor are require for these cells to exist. Food is always giving as simplified form rather than in the raw form encouter. The human cells are part of a system rather than being the system.
loseyourname
Jul9-04, 11:53 AM
My guess is that this question will have no meaning within a decade. The word "protist" is extremely vague at this point and very nearly meaningless. At least that's been my experience learning taxonomy. Ian is the expert here.
Moonbear
Jul9-04, 08:21 PM
Sperm, phagocytes, etc. are not different species, they are specialized cells produced by humans. Therefore, they cannot be considered protists. Protists refers to an entirely separate classification of organisms.
wasteofo2
Jul10-04, 02:15 AM
But they certainly are alive on their own, even if they are produced by cells inside a human and are kept alive by human bodily functions, what would they be considered if not protists?
loseyourname
Jul10-04, 03:07 PM
They aren't alive on their own. They cannot reproduce.
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.