How Much Should Guitar String Tension Be Reduced to Lower Frequency by 2%?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bpogi
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The original poster attempts to determine the percentage reduction in tension required to decrease the fundamental frequency of a guitar string by 2%. The problem involves understanding the relationship between tension and frequency in the context of string physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the formula relating frequency to tension and explore how to manipulate it to find the required tension reduction. Some express confusion over the complexity of their equations and seek clarification on the correct approach.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided insights into the relationship between tension and frequency, suggesting that the problem can be approached through proportional reasoning and differentials. There is ongoing exploration of various methods to express the tension change in terms of frequency change, but no consensus has been reached on a single approach.

Contextual Notes

Assumptions include that the string length and mass per unit length remain constant during the tension adjustment. Participants also note the challenge of applying percentage change calculations correctly in this context.

bpogi
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, I ran into a problem that I can't figure out:

In order to decrease the fundamental frequency of a guitar string by 2.0%, by what percentage should you reduce the tension?

I know it's some kind of trick question, but I have no clue what the relationship between tension and frequency is. Could someone help me out? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
[tex] f=\frac{1}{2L}\sqrt{\frac{T}{\rho}}[/tex]

f = fundamental frequency
L = string length between fixed points
T = string tension
[itex]\rho[/itex] = string mass per unit length
 
Thanks for that formula!
Okay, now that I've been given the relationship between tension and frequency, how do I go about finding the percentage to reduce the tension by? I came up with a very complicated equation that lead me nowhere...
f - f/.02 = (1/2L)(T/u)^1/2 - (1/.0008L)(T/u)^1/2, where T = tension, u = mass density, f = frequency, and L = length. I don't know where to go from here, or even if that's the right direction.
 
Assume that [itex]\rho[/itex] and L are constants.

[tex]f=\frac{1}{2L\sqrt{\rho}}}\sqrt{T}[/tex]

The only variable is T so one could say f is proportional to a constant(k) times the root of T:

[tex] f\ \propto\ k\sqrt{T}[/tex]

If you let k=1 then you're left with(for your purposes at least):

[tex] f\ \propto\ \sqrt{T}[/tex]

You could do the problem leaving k in if you like because it will cancel in the end, but that's your perogative.

You should be able to solve it now. When looking for things like percent change try and figure out which variables are actually changing. Here, L would not change because you are not moving the points of connection and a 2% change would have nominal effect on the actual length of the string. Rho is mass/length thus it too is unchanged. We can group the constants and say the chage in frequency is dictated by the change in the tension of the string.

Also, your approach to %change doesn't look entirely correct.

[tex] \% change_T=\frac{T_i-T_f}{T_i}\times 100\%[/tex]

Where Ti is initial tension and Tf is final tension.

[tex] f_i\ \propto\ k\sqrt{T_i}\ \propto\ \frac{f_f}{98\%}[/tex]

and you know that [itex]f_f[/itex] is equal to [itex](100\%-2\%)f_i[/itex]. Solve the entire problem using the above percent chage formula in terms of [itex]f_f[/itex] or [itex]f_i[/itex]. Either way works but you need to use the same frequency throughout.

Good luck.

[edit] fixed my crazy sqrt
 
Last edited:
You can certainly do this by brute force. But an easier way to approach it is to realize that small changes can be approximated by differentials. A 2% change is small enough.

Start with this variation of faust9's proportion:
[tex]T \propto f^2 = k f^2[/tex]
Then [itex]\Delta T = \frac{dT}{df} \Delta f[/itex]. Figure the derivative and express this equation in terms of percent (fractions) to find the simple answer.
 
bpogi said:
Thanks for that formula!
Okay, now that I've been given the relationship between tension and frequency, how do I go about finding the percentage to reduce the tension by? I came up with a very complicated equation that lead me nowhere...
f - f/.02 = (1/2L)(T/u)^1/2 - (1/.0008L)(T/u)^1/2, where T = tension, u = mass density, f = frequency, and L = length. I don't know where to go from here, or even if that's the right direction.

A slighlty different description of what faust said:

You could set it up this way:
[tex]0.98 \times f_1= f_2[/tex]
[tex]0.98 \times \frac{1}{2L} \sqrt{\frac{T_1}{\rho}}=\frac{1}{2L}\sqrt{\frac{T_2}{\rho}[/tex]
...a bunch of stuff drops out
[tex]0.98 \times \sqrt{T_1} = \sqrt{T_2}[/tex]
and so on.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
15K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
10K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K