View Full Version : elements 118 and higher = why?
let's asume that the higher we go, the more stable the element is, or so i am lead to believe.
let's asume that at 160, it is perfectly stable. what would be the point? what i mean is, what could we use such a heavy material for? construction? AP ammo? engine blocks?
it seems to me there are 3 key points to using one material over another.
1) weight
2) strength
3) volume
eg, you could make a Titanium sword. It would be stronger, and lighter, but it's "volume" would be greatly larger. if it came to engine blocks of a car, this would be bad cos it would make the engine much larger (albeit stronger and lighter)
so what would such a heavy element be good for?
which element has the highest strengh to weight ratio?
------------------------------------------------------------------
caution, the above poster may have no idea what he's talking about.
let's asume that the higher we go, the more stable the element is, or so i am lead to believe.Are you referring to the island of stability (http://www.fact-index.com/i/is/island_of_stability.html)? 'Stability' is rather relative; there is an expectation that some nuclides near element 114 will be considerably more stable than heavier and lighter ones, but the expected half-lives are still no more than seconds (or much less). Not much good for car engine blocks :wink:
i was talking about that, yes. but what about after that?
russ_watters
Jul22-04, 11:06 AM
eg, you could make a Titanium sword. It would be stronger, and lighter, but it's "volume" would be greatly larger. if it came to engine blocks of a car, this would be bad cos it would make the engine much larger (albeit stronger and lighter) Actually, no - strength of material is generally in terms of volume or area, ie tensile strength is pounds per square inch. Titanium both has a higher tensile strength than steel and a higher strength to weight ratio. So a titanium sword would be both stronger and lighter than a steel one of identical proportions. which element has the highest strengh to weight ratio? I think its titanium, but you can exceed that with alloys and carbon composites.
i was talking about that, yes. but what about after that?... the nuclides become increasingly unstable, with half-lives of microseconds or less (OK, maybe one or two get to live as long as a millisecond).
A titantium sword might not really be an effective weapon.
If it were a "thrusting" weapon like a foil or an epee, it might be nice because it would minimize fatigue on the combatant.
But if titanium were used on a "slashing" weapon such as a sabre, it might not be effective because it doesn't carry as much momentum to it's target.
-Glenn
Entropy
Jul31-04, 12:29 AM
which element has the highest strengh to weight ratio?
BEC Helium is the strongest material known to man.
But if you're talking about something more down-to-Earth, then diamond is the strongest.
Both only contain one element! :wink:
Seiya Hilendith
Sep22-04, 03:03 AM
How about Lithium in a Vacuum? I am sure it has a large strength to weight ratio, if only because of its low weight.
WE also worry about shearing forces. Eg Depleted uranium is agreat for shells because is shows a phenominae called Adiabatic Shearing force.
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2012, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.