Dynamics Question: Mass Moment of Inertia & Work Done by Gravity

  • Thread starter Thread starter seto6
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dynamics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of the mass moment of inertia and the work done by gravity in a physics problem involving a disk. Participants express confusion regarding the exclusion of the disk's mass moment of inertia in the calculation for T2 and the rationale behind calculating the work done by gravity at a single point. Additionally, concerns are raised about unit conversions, specifically the transition from feet to meters and the division of pounds by m/s² leading to kilograms, which raises doubts about the validity of the results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mass moment of inertia concepts
  • Familiarity with work-energy principles in physics
  • Knowledge of unit conversions between imperial and metric systems
  • Basic grasp of gravitational force calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of mass moment of inertia for rigid bodies
  • Study the work-energy theorem and its applications in mechanics
  • Learn about unit conversion techniques between different measurement systems
  • Examine examples of gravitational work calculations in various contexts
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of work and energy in relation to rotational dynamics.

seto6
Messages
248
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



ok this is the problem :

5os8t4.jpg


i kinda get how to do it (using energy + work method)

i don't get it why they don't include the mass moment of inertia of the disk for T2
and why did they only calculate the work done by gravity only for one point which is of ab.


2. solution

30kx6qf.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Who gave you that solution? I didn't look that far into it, but I am confused with their units. All of a sudden ft changed to meters. And I am not sure but it looks like they divided pounds by m/s^2 and got kg. I would not trust that result at all.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
15K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K