Electric field due to infinite sheet of charge

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the electric field due to an infinite sheet of charge, particularly why it remains constant regardless of distance, contrasting it with the behavior of electric fields from point charges and infinite line charges.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between electric field intensity and distance for different charge distributions, questioning the independence of the electric field from distance for an infinite sheet of charge compared to an infinite line of charge.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered explanations regarding the mathematical reasoning behind the electric field behavior, referencing concepts such as charge per unit length and area. Others are seeking further clarification on related theorems, indicating an ongoing exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the divergence theorem and Gauss' Law, with some participants expressing uncertainty about these concepts, which may affect their understanding of the electric field derivations.

jyothsna pb
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
the electric field intensity due to a charged body decreases as the distance from it increases. why is then the electric field intensity due to an infinite sheet of charge independent of the distance from it? if it is because the distance of the test charge from d sheet is negligibly small as compared to its size, is the same not applicable for infinite line of charge? but intensity due to an infinite line of charge is inversely proportional to distance from it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A simple explanation: The electric field of a point charge is inversely proportional to r^2. For a line charge, it is infinite in one of the directions so you will never be far enough away from it to observe the 1/r^2, but you can observe the 1/r. You are basically replacing one of the r's with L, and then you have Q/L = [itex]\lambda[/itex] (charge per unit length).

For a 2d sheet, it is infinite in 2 directions. So that completely cancels out the 1/r^2 and you are left with a constant. Or replacing both r's in r^2 with A = area to get [itex]Q/A = \sigma[/itex] (charger per unit area).

This is a very basic explanation.
 
Last edited:
has this got something to do with the divergence theorem? pls can someone simplfy dat? i have no idea abt dat theorem
 
Take the infinite line charge in the z-direction as an example. If you cut out an infinitesmal plane in the x-y direction, then you can solve the electric field in that plane alone with charge, [itex]\lambda dx[/itex]. And you can say it is periodic above and below this plane to get back the full solution.

So you have a 2D poisson equation for a point charge. This ends up giving you a 1/r term for the electric field. So the infinite line charge acts like a point charge in 2 dimensions.

You can do the same for an infinite sheet charge in the x-y plane, by taking a 1D space in the z-direction and saying it is periodic in the x and y-directions. Solve for the E-field in 1D space, you get a constant. So an infinite sheet charge acts like a point charge in 1 dimension.
 
thanks 4 d reply
 
If you are looking for a physical intuition, then post #2 above, by nick is useful. However, if you want to derive these results, the easiest way to do that is via Gauss' Law (not to be confused with Gauss' theorem, aka the divergence theorem).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
914
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K