Can Movement Occur in a Universe with Unquantized Distance?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kjones000
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Meter
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of a universe where distance is not quantized, exploring the philosophical and theoretical aspects of movement, measurement, and the potential for life in such a universe. Participants engage with concepts of distance, meaning, and the nature of reality in both quantized and unquantized frameworks.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether movement is possible in a universe without quantized distance, suggesting that such a universe may not have self-consistent rules.
  • Another participant asserts that if the universe is not quantized, then the concept of 100 meters loses its meaning, prompting further inquiry into the nature of measurement.
  • A participant challenges the assertion that unquantized distance precludes meaningful measurements, arguing that lengths could be defined based on different criteria.
  • Further elaboration is provided on the idea that if nothing is quantized in a hypothetical universe, then conventional measurements like 100 meters would lack meaning.
  • One participant presents a mathematical exercise regarding how many times a hero would need to halve the distance to reach a Planck length from the finish line, arriving at a numerical solution with minimal calculation.
  • Another participant explains the mathematical reasoning behind the calculation, detailing the logarithmic approach used to derive the number of halvings required.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of unquantized distance, with some arguing that it negates the meaning of conventional measurements while others contend that alternative definitions of length could exist. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the broader implications of movement and measurement in such a universe.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of distance and measurement in both quantized and unquantized contexts. The discussion also highlights the dependence on mathematical frameworks to explore these concepts.

kjones000
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
An ancient greek philosopher, an ancient greek hero, and Shrodenger's cat walk into a bar. Ok, forget the cat. The philosopher gets so drunk that he decides to prove to the hero that he can't reach the finish line of a 100 meter dash because he would have to go half the remaining distance an infinite number of times.

Now, we all know that the philosopher's reasoning was purposefully flawed, but DO WE KNOW FOR CERTAIN that movement is possible in a universe where distance is not quantized? After all, we haven't got such a universe to experiment on. Do we know for certain that a complex universe where distance and time are NOT quantized could even have self consistent rules? If the answer is yes, do we know that such a universe could support life?

As a side note: an exercise left for the reader's calculator, how many times would the hero have to go half the distance before he got a Planck length from the finish line? Bonus points for the person who has to press the fewest buttons to find the answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the universe is not quantized, then 100 meters has no meaning.
 
Huh?

wuliheron said:
If the universe is not quantized, then 100 meters has no meaning.

Huh? Why? Did I use the wrong word? Should I have said "quantumized". The spell checker says that is not a word. How could the universe not being chopped up in Planck length sized units preclude "100 Meters" from having meaning? Its true that you couldn't assign it an integer number based on the underlying granularity of space, but who ever said that a length can't be based on something else?
 
kjones000 said:
Huh? Why? Did I use the wrong word? Should I have said "quantumized". The spell checker says that is not a word. How could the universe not being chopped up in Planck length sized units preclude "100 Meters" from having meaning? Its true that you couldn't assign it an integer number based on the underlying granularity of space, but who ever said that a length can't be based on something else?

Words only have demonstrable meaning according to their function in a given context.

In this case, quantized refers to the observation that nature comes in bits and pieces, specific quantities. However, we also observe that these quantities act like waves, which are not quantized. If another universe existed where nothing was quantized, then literally 100 meters would have no meaning.
 
kjones000 said:
... an exercise left for the reader's calculator, how many times would the hero have to go half the distance before he got a Planck length from the finish line?

My calculator expressed appreciation and no small surprise at having a problem left for it, and it says that N = 123 ought to work.

it gets this number with almost no buttons pressed because it is

[tex]\frac{37}{log_{10}2}[/tex]
 
I suspected you might wonder why the reader's calculator thinks that is the answer, so I inquired and got this response.

the idea is to find N

[tex]\frac{100}{2^N}<1.616\times 10^{-35}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{100}{1.616\times 10^{-35}}<2^N[/tex]

[tex]\log_2 2^N = N[/tex]
and for any number X
[tex]\log_2 X = \frac{log_{10}X}{log_{10}2}[/tex]

Taking log base two of both sides
[tex]\frac{37 - \log_{10}1.616}{\log_{10}2}<N[/tex]

and [tex]\inline{ \log_{10}1.616}}[/tex] is negligible so one looks for

[tex]\frac{37}{\log_{10}2}<N[/tex]

which takes few strokes
 
Damn Marcus you are everywhere-- I will have to read this when its not one in the morning

i have to get up soon
night
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
13K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K