How does the Cavendish Experiment relate moment of inertia to elasticity?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the moment of inertia and elasticity as illustrated by the Cavendish experiment. Participants explore the equations governing the motion of torsional pendulums and their analogies to linear oscillation systems, as well as the factors affecting the time period of such systems.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the derivation of the equation T = 2 π √(I/k) in relation to the more familiar T = 2 π √(m/k), suggesting a lack of clarity in the transition from mass to moment of inertia.
  • Another participant proposes that the moment of inertia is incorporated into the constant k, assuming a constant radius.
  • A clarification is made regarding the distinction between torsional stiffness (k) and linear stiffness, noting their respective units and how both equations arise from the equations of motion for their systems.
  • A participant expresses interest in a more detailed explanation of the relationship between the equations and the underlying physics.
  • Discussion includes the application of Hooke's law to both linear and torsional systems, with equations of motion being presented for both scenarios.
  • One participant mentions their current coursework and expresses understanding of the concepts discussed, highlighting the cleverness of the analogy between linear and rotational motion.
  • A request is made for an equation to derive torsional stiffness involving Young's modulus, which is addressed by another participant who explains its dependence on shear modulus and geometry.
  • Another participant seeks resources for researching factors affecting the time period and damping effects of a torsional pendulum.
  • A question is raised about how length affects the time period of a torsional pendulum, prompting a response that provides a specific equation relating k, G, and the geometry of the system.
  • A participant shares their derived equation for the time period, expressing a desire for a simpler relationship without needing to calculate moment of inertia.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit a mix of agreement and uncertainty regarding the relationships between the equations discussed. While some clarify and build upon each other's points, others express confusion or seek further simplification, indicating that consensus on certain aspects remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various physical principles and equations, but there are limitations in the assumptions made regarding the constants and variables involved, particularly in the transition from linear to torsional systems. The discussion also reflects varying levels of familiarity with the concepts, which may influence interpretations.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students and educators in physics, particularly those studying oscillatory motion, torsional dynamics, and the applications of elasticity in physical systems.

Cyrus
Messages
3,246
Reaction score
17
Hi, I have been reading about the cavendish experiment and in one equation they say that

[tex]T = 2 \pi \sqrt{\frac I k}[/tex]

where I is the moment of inertia and k is the elastic constant.

in my physics books i only find [tex]T = 2 \pi \sqrt{\frac m k}[/tex]

where m is the mass, not the moment of inertia, anyone know how they got to this equation?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Since moment of inertia is usually something like mass x radius squared,
I think they have kept the radius constant and included it in the constant k.
 
The k in your first equation is a torsional stiffness with units (Nm)/rad

The k in your second equation is a linear stiffness with units N/m

If you work out the units, you will see that they both work out properly. Both equations come from the equations of motion for each system (meaning the differential equation that describes the motion of the system). We can get into that if you like; just let me know.
 
Hey James, Id sure like it if you could explain that in more detail please. I will look forward to your post. I will try to find some more info in this via the net in the meantime.

Look forward to reading your post.


Cyrus Abdollahi
 
Consider a simple physical system composed of a mass attached to a (grounded) spring. If you were to pull the mass a distance x, the restoring force from the spring with a magnitude equal to |kx|, where k is the stiffness of the spring and has units of N/m. This comes from Hooke's law.

Say you want to write the equation of motion for this simple system (this should be in your textbook). Draw a free body diagram and remember Newton's second law so that you can write:

[tex]m\ddot x = -kx[/tex]
[tex]\ddot x + \frac{k}{m}x = 0[/tex]

The solution to this differential equation is:

[tex]x = A\cos\left(\omega_nt + \phi \right)[/tex]

(I hope this looks familiar.) In this equation,
ωn = √(k/m) and the period of the motion is given by:
[tex]T = \frac{2\pi}{\omega_n} = 2\pi\sqrt{\frac m k}[/tex]

Now all of this is analagous to the torsional situation in Cavendish's experiment. Now, Hooke's law looks like this:

[tex]\tau = K_t \theta[/tex]

where Kt is the torsional stiffness (of the wire) that we're talking about, with units [Nm/rad].

The analagous equation of motion becomes:
[tex]\ddot \theta + \frac{K_t}{I}\theta = 0[/tex]
[tex]\theta = A\cos\left(\omega_nt + \phi \right)[/tex]

and in this case, ωn = √(Kt/I)

so

[tex]T = \frac{2\pi}{\omega_n} = 2\pi\sqrt{\frac{I}{K_t}}[/tex]

So I hope that made things clearer rather than muddier. Let me know if I can help any more.
 
I am taking physics 2 right now and we did this as the first chapter! WOO HOO! Thanks it all makes sense to me now. WOW what a clever way of making linear oscialtion into rotational through the use of that little picture. What a clever guy that hooke was.
 
James or anyone else, is there an equation to derive the torsional stiffness (k), involving say young's modulus? Thanks.
 
Yes. It is a function the shear modulus, G (which is related to Young's modulus by Poisson's ratio for isotropic materials) and the geometry of the cross section. KT = GJ(x)
(J(x) is the polar moment of inertia of the cross section). For example, for a cylinder, the cross section is a circle, for which J = πd4/32.
 
Thanks James...that was very helpful.

The investigation i am doing now is to do with the factors that affect the time period and damping effects of a torsional pendulum. Recommend any good places for research?
 
  • #10
How does length affect the time period of a torsional pendulum?
 
  • #11
Joep...come on Joe I've told you before! k=GPi d^4/32L

T=2Pi(SQRT(I/K))

Substitute all that together and you'll have it.
 
  • #12
yeah by doing that i got

Gd^4
T= -------
64 l sqrt I

I was looking for something like T = k * l^1/2
or something, as I wasn't banking on working
out moment of inertia etc. ah well... cheers JF.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
6K
  • · Replies 138 ·
5
Replies
138
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K