Could M-Dimensional Time Change Our Understanding of Spacetime?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter goldeng8
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the concept of M-dimensional time and its implications for our understanding of spacetime. Participants consider theoretical frameworks, mathematical representations, and philosophical interpretations related to the nature of time in physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes the historical context of multi-dimensional spacetime and questions the implications of introducing M-dimensional time.
  • Another participant mentions F-theory, which proposes an additional time dimension, developed by Cumrun Vafa.
  • A participant presents a mathematical transformation of the spacetime interval, suggesting that time can be represented with multiple dimensions, leading to a new invariant equation.
  • One participant recounts a personal anecdote about a teacher's assertion that time is a parameter rather than a dimension, expressing confusion over this distinction.
  • A later reply supports the teacher's view, arguing that while space has three degrees of freedom, time does not allow for the same kind of movement, suggesting a fundamental difference in how we experience time compared to space.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of time, with some supporting the idea of time as a dimension and others arguing it is merely a parameter. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants' claims involve various assumptions about the nature of time and spacetime, and the mathematical formulations presented depend on specific interpretations of physical concepts. The discussion does not resolve these assumptions or definitions.

goldeng8
The idea of 3,4,...11 dimensional spacetime has been around for a while.

This always means (N-1)-dimensional space, with the usual addition of time as one dimensional.

Are there any serious thoughts on the possibility of M-dimensional time, and what this would mean in the physical world?

(Maybe this is somewhat of a parallel discussion to the earlier post of 'imaginary time' here, but I decided to start a new thread anyway)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
F theory

there's a theory that adds another time dimension and it's called f theory.
the developer of theory is cumrun vafa.
 
Here is something to contemplate.

The four dimensions of basic relativity are ct, x, y, z. Though often called one time dimension and three space dimensions, in fact, 'ct' is a space dimension (speed times time). A famous relativity space invariant equation is

s2 = - (ct)2 + x2 + y2 + z2

Now represent this by substituting uniform variable names from

x0 <== ct
x1 <== x
x2 <== y
x3 <== z

Here is the result.

s2 = - x02 + x12 + x22 + x32

Every term is a space term.

But it can all be rewritten in time dimensions.

&TAU <== is/c
t0 <== t
t1 <== x/c
t2 <== y/c
t3 <== z/c

The result.

&TAU2 = + t02 - t12 - t22 - t32

This is a relativity time invariant equation using four time dimensions.
 
This has few to be with the subject however, when I was 'studiying' Quantum Mechanics, one day my teacher told (looking at me when I was about to fall asleep) that the time was not a dimension, it was a parameter. I never understood what he was talking about that day.
 
Originally posted by Doctor Luz
This has few to be with the subject however, when I was 'studiying' Quantum Mechanics, one day my teacher told (looking at me when I was about to fall asleep) that the time was not a dimension, it was a parameter. I never understood what he was talking about that day.

Your teacher was right. Space has three degrees of freedom, that is what a dimension is, a degree of freedom. But you can't move around in time the same way, if you move around in space a lot you change your movement in time some, but bsically you move through time at the same rate, whether you want to or not.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
10K
Replies
90
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 82 ·
3
Replies
82
Views
8K
Replies
58
Views
6K