Could M-Dimensional Time Change Our Understanding of Spacetime?

  • Thread starter Thread starter goldeng8
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Time
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the concept of higher-dimensional spacetime, specifically the idea of M-dimensional time and its implications for physics. F-theory, developed by Cumrun Vafa, introduces an additional time dimension, prompting a reevaluation of traditional spacetime equations. The conversation highlights that while time is often treated as a dimension, it may function more accurately as a parameter, contrasting with the three spatial dimensions that allow for movement. Participants note that time's progression is constant and unidirectional, unlike spatial dimensions. Overall, the dialogue reflects on the complexities of integrating multiple time dimensions into existing physical theories.
goldeng8
The idea of 3,4,...11 dimensional spacetime has been around for a while.

This always means (N-1)-dimensional space, with the usual addition of time as one dimensional.

Are there any serious thoughts on the possibility of M-dimensional time, and what this would mean in the physical world?

(Maybe this is somewhat of a parallel discussion to the earlier post of 'imaginary time' here, but I decided to start a new thread anyway)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
F theory

there's a theory that adds another time dimension and it's called f theory.
the developer of theory is cumrun vafa.
 
Here is something to contemplate.

The four dimensions of basic relativity are ct, x, y, z. Though often called one time dimension and three space dimensions, in fact, 'ct' is a space dimension (speed times time). A famous relativity space invariant equation is

s2 = - (ct)2 + x2 + y2 + z2

Now represent this by substituting uniform variable names from

x0 <== ct
x1 <== x
x2 <== y
x3 <== z

Here is the result.

s2 = - x02 + x12 + x22 + x32

Every term is a space term.

But it can all be rewritten in time dimensions.

&TAU <== is/c
t0 <== t
t1 <== x/c
t2 <== y/c
t3 <== z/c

The result.

&TAU2 = + t02 - t12 - t22 - t32

This is a relativity time invariant equation using four time dimensions.
 
This has few to be with the subject however, when I was 'studiying' Quantum Mechanics, one day my teacher told (looking at me when I was about to fall asleep) that the time was not a dimension, it was a parameter. I never understood what he was talking about that day.
 
Originally posted by Doctor Luz
This has few to be with the subject however, when I was 'studiying' Quantum Mechanics, one day my teacher told (looking at me when I was about to fall asleep) that the time was not a dimension, it was a parameter. I never understood what he was talking about that day.

Your teacher was right. Space has three degrees of freedom, that is what a dimension is, a degree of freedom. But you can't move around in time the same way, if you move around in space a lot you change your movement in time some, but bsically you move through time at the same rate, whether you want to or not.
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top