Will France Successfully Rescue Their Hostages?

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter GENIERE
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the hostage situation involving French nationals, with participants expressing various opinions on France's historical and current political stance, particularly in relation to military conflicts such as the Iraq War. The scope includes historical references, national identity, and the implications of foreign policy decisions.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Historical
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express skepticism about the effectiveness of France's approach to the hostage situation.
  • Others argue that historical context, such as France's military history, should not overshadow the current humanitarian issue.
  • Several comments reference the Iraq War, with some participants defending France's decision not to participate and criticizing the U.S. invasion.
  • Some participants feel a sense of guilt or conflict regarding France's non-involvement in military actions, while others assert that it was a principled stance.
  • There are references to the impact of the Iraq War on global perceptions of France and its policies, with some arguing that the invasion has exacerbated issues of fundamentalism.
  • Participants share personal connections to France, adding a layer of emotional investment to the discussion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus among participants. While some agree on the importance of France's historical context and current political stance, others challenge these views, leading to a mix of support and criticism regarding France's actions and the broader implications of the Iraq War.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various historical events and political decisions without resolving the complexities involved. The discussion reflects a range of personal experiences and opinions that contribute to the overall debate.

GENIERE
How will the French handle their hostage situation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dunno, but I have heard that it is wise to never bet against anyone fighting the French.
 
Or you could read some history...
 
JohnDubYa said:
Dunno, but I have heard that it is wise to never bet against anyone fighting the French.

Fortunately for you, this is not true.
Otherwise, you'd still be enjoying the privilege of being a over-taxed British colonial.
 
Remember the episode of The Simpsons when they visited Australia? :D
 
Dunno, but I have heard that it is wise to never bet against anyone fighting the French.

Freedom fries never really caught on, did they? :approve:
 
Look up the term "Vichy France" in the dictionary.
 
JohnDubYa said:
Look up the term "Vichy France" in the dictionary.

:mad:

I've had it with your childish country-bashing. This was supposed to be a thread about two HUMAN BEINGS trying to do their job being kidnapped.
Yet for some reason you insist on picking on an instance 60 years ago, that you had nothing to do with.
Ever been to France? Spent some time with French people?
What have they done to you that you hold such a grudge?
 
And I hope the French captives are released.
 
  • #10
Apparenly the French still sport gonads as part of their anatomy. Hopefully the reporters will be returned unharned.

John McCain: "And, as we've been a good friend to other countries in moments of shared perils, so we have good reason to expect their solidarity with us in this struggle."

The US is at war! Can you understand this? We are at war! You are a friend, an enemy, or not worth consideration. Are you friend, a foe, or a pesty gnat?
 
  • #11
The US is at war! Can you understand this? We are at war! You are a friend, an enemy, or not worth consideration. Are you friend, a foe, or a pesty gnat?

:eek: Now I'm just appalled. Are you still bitter over the French having enough sense to not want to be involved in something as blatantly wrong as the invasion of Iraq? If a friend tries to stop you from driving drunk, do you verbally abuse them, and hate them for their sober perspective? I was shocked by the hatred people in the American media, as well as in people such as yourself at the French during the beginning of the war. Don't be angry at people with common sense, it just makes you look devoid of it.
 
  • #12
Bitter? No! Simply not worth considering, small change, irrelevant…
 
  • #13
The difference between Desert Storm and Iraqi Freedom was partly due to the lack of small change...

Perhaps Bush should fire the State Dept. and hire you instead ?
 
  • #14
Gza said:
:eek: Now I'm just appalled. Are you still bitter over the French having enough sense to not want to be involved in something as blatantly wrong as the invasion of Iraq? If a friend tries to stop you from driving drunk, do you verbally abuse them, and hate them for their sober perspective? I was shocked by the hatred people in the American media, as well as in people such as yourself at the French during the beginning of the war. Don't be angry at people with common sense, it just makes you look devoid of it.

I am french. Thank you Gza. I would like to add that it is not easy for us either to keep in this attitude. We do feel guilty for not helping a friend at war. Usually, once the decision has been taken, everybody goes to war, even the ones that were against war before the begining. In the present case, not only did we think there were alternative solutions, we also think the situation has/will become impossible to handle. But today, I feel like Switzerland people : we are on the side of the field. We are not part of the "game" (sorry, just don't know a better word for this thought) ... feel useless. :frown:
 
  • #15
I'd rather be completely out of this game, than in a country which supports Bush's war for profit. And yes, I am about to get moving.
 
  • #16
humanino said:
I am french. Thank you Gza. I would like to add that it is not easy for us either to keep in this attitude. We do feel guilty for not helping a friend at war. Usually, once the decision has been taken, everybody goes to war, even the ones that were against war before the begining. In the present case, not only did we think there were alternative solutions, we also think the situation has/will become impossible to handle. But today, I feel like Switzerland people : we are on the side of the field. We are not part of the "game" (sorry, just don't know a better word for this thought) ... feel useless. :frown:

Well-stated Humanino. You, as an individual, have earned my respect but I believe your government's policies are an obstacle to peace. Had the French joined the coalition I believe the war in Iraq would not have been necessary.
 
  • #17
GENIERE said:
Bitter [over the French]? No! Simply not worth considering, small change, irrelevant…

GENIERE said:
Had the French joined the coalition I believe the war in Iraq would not have been necessary.

A flip-flop ?

<all in jest ! :biggrin:>
 
  • #18
Gokul43201 said:
A flip-flop ?

<all in jest ! :biggrin:>

Please don't count my flip-flops; I have no defense.
 
  • #19
GENIERE said:
Had the French joined the coalition I believe the war in Iraq would not have been necessary.
Wasn't the whole point of the "coalition of the willing" to get people on-side for the US invasion?
 
  • #20
Gza said:
:eek: Now I'm just appalled. Are you still bitter over the French having enough sense to not want to be involved in something as blatantly wrong as the invasion of Iraq? If a friend tries to stop you from driving drunk, do you verbally abuse them, and hate them for their sober perspective? I was shocked by the hatred people in the American media, as well as in people such as yourself at the French during the beginning of the war. Don't be angry at people with common sense, it just makes you look devoid of it.
Nice to see some truth! wish my country had, had the b! to say no!
 
  • #21
I cannot understand that anyone still supports the disaster in Iraq and blames the French for doing the right thing. Iraq was contained and the US invasion has done exactly what we in Europe expected: make a bigger mess. It has de facto helped the fundamentalist cause in a country that before the invasion was rather a buffer against muslim radicalism. If US voters feel they have to support this, they have to bear the consequences and not start whining about the lack of support of wiser countries. If you want a hint on how to deal with growing fundamentalism, consider the "religious symbols ban" in France, the supposed reason for the hostage taking mentioned here. I guess not many rightwingers here will even try to understand, but France including the muslim population is united more than ever,despite the discussion about the religious symbols. I guess Geniere is right. If France would have joined the coalition, the invasion would not have been necessary, on condition of course that they would have followed the French line of steadfastness of principles without resorting to blind violence (on the wrong target in case of Iraq). But that would not have been so macho, would it? http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/06/international/europe/06SPIEGEL.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #22
Gza said:
:eek: Now I'm just appalled. Are you still bitter over the French having enough sense to not want to be involved in something as blatantly wrong as the invasion of Iraq? If a friend tries to stop you from driving drunk, do you verbally abuse them, and hate them for their sober perspective? I was shocked by the hatred people in the American media, as well as in people such as yourself at the French during the beginning of the war. Don't be angry at people with common sense, it just makes you look devoid of it.

Im half french, thank you Gza.
My grandfather was a commando for the free french.
 
Last edited:
  • #23
Mercator said:
I cannot understand that anyone still supports the disaster in Iraq and blames the French for doing the right thing. Iraq was contained and the US invasion has done exactly what we in Europe expected: make a bigger mess. It has de facto helped the fundamentalist cause in a country that before the invasion was rather a buffer against muslim radicalism.

Leaving Iraq will make the mess even bigger. Not supporting the "disaster" in Iraq now equals supporting a disaster on a biblical scale. Get over your hatred and be constructive.
 
  • #24
I, and the French for that matter HAVE been constructive from the beginning. Somebody just did not listen. Which hatred are you talking about? No false accusations please. As for Iraq, you make me think about a kid who just wrecked his car during a trip which his friend did not want to join, and now he wants his friend to get him out of the mess. Of course we will pick you up at the police station, but the explanation to your father YOU will have to do. But we were discussing the French hostage situation here. Interesting is that the initial demand to abolish the " religiuos symbol act" has been dropped and now the thugs demand a ransom. Islam clerics regard France as a country they can discuss with. This should ring a bell if you are looking for solutions for the Iraq disaster.
 
  • #25
Mercator said:
Islam clerics regard France as a country they can discuss with. This should ring a bell if you are looking for solutions for the Iraq disaster.

So you think France can talk the hostages free? Or are you saying that paying millions of ransom is a succesfull strategy to end violence from radical muslims?
Have you ever wondered why radical clerics might discuss with France and not the US? Perhaps its the fact that the US started this war.
So tell me, how would this fact be undone? How are we going to solve Iraqs problems by talking, when one party is unwilling to talk with the other party? And the Americans are NOT the ones unwilling to talk.
 
  • #26
Correction: "how are we going to solve the US problems in Iraq." Pardon me for saying, but I would also not start a friendly discussion with somebody invading my home (because a neighbour did something wrong). First get out, then perhaps talk, or what would you do? That "getting out" of Iraq is now very difficult is something of your own making. We may want to help you, but don't make it sound as if your not responsible. There IS a way out, I just doubt that Americans would go so far as to accept that countries like France and many other UN nations are much better placed to clean up the mess you made. In fact I predict that eventually the UN WILL be involved and countries like France WILL do your dirty laundry, and the US will still despise them for it. The reaction of the Americans to the French wise decison not to join the coalition (of willing to make a buck) was one of the most degrading episodes of the last decades. It will not be until Americans see this that they will stop making always bigger mess. By the way, I am not French. I hate the self indulgent pseudo intellectual posers ;-)
 
  • #27
I, and the French for that matter HAVE been constructive from the beginning.

Okay, so the sanctions designed to force Saddam Hussein into obeying UN resolutions were killing tens of thousands every year, what was your country's STATED solution to ending the sanctions?

Somebody just did not listen. Which hatred are you talking about? No false accusations please. As for Iraq, you make me think about a kid who just wrecked his car during a trip which his friend did not want to join, and now he wants his friend to get him out of the mess.

Except the kid was driving over to fix another mess that the friend was involved in creating. The UN resolutions and ensuing sanctions were imposed by France just as much as the US. The US and its true allies were willing to enforce the resolutions, which ultimately led to the end of the sanctions.

Islam clerics regard France as a country they can discuss with.

Translation: They think your country can be rolled.
 
  • #28
JohnDubYa said:
Okay, so the sanctions designed to force Saddam Hussein into obeying UN resolutions were killing tens of thousands every year, what was your country's STATED solution to ending the sanctions?



Except the kid was driving over to fix another mess that the friend was involved in creating. The UN resolutions and ensuing sanctions were imposed by France just as much as the US. The US and its true allies were willing to enforce the resolutions, which ultimately led to the end of the sanctions.



Translation: They think your country can be rolled.

So Islam clerics are automatically thugs for you? Nice departure point to start a discussion.

Tell me, what was the invasion in Iraq for, humanitarian purposes or the perceived threat? Because all Americans I discussed with switch between these options whenever convenient to save them in the discussion. It cannot be both, so take your pick before we discuss further.
 
  • #29
Mercator said:
So Islam clerics are automatically thugs for you? Nice departure point to start a discussion.

Tell me, what was the invasion in Iraq for, humanitarian purposes or the perceived threat? Because all Americans I discussed with switch between these options whenever convenient to save them in the discussion. It cannot be both, so take your pick before we discuss further.
Erm, exactly why can't it be both? :rolleyes:
 
  • #30
Because it just CAN'T, THAT'S WHY!
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K