GENIERE
How will the French handle their hostage situation?
The discussion revolves around the hostage situation involving French nationals, with participants expressing various opinions on France's historical and current political stance, particularly in relation to military conflicts such as the Iraq War. The scope includes historical references, national identity, and the implications of foreign policy decisions.
There is no consensus among participants. While some agree on the importance of France's historical context and current political stance, others challenge these views, leading to a mix of support and criticism regarding France's actions and the broader implications of the Iraq War.
Participants reference various historical events and political decisions without resolving the complexities involved. The discussion reflects a range of personal experiences and opinions that contribute to the overall debate.
JohnDubYa said:Dunno, but I have heard that it is wise to never bet against anyone fighting the French.
Dunno, but I have heard that it is wise to never bet against anyone fighting the French.

JohnDubYa said:Look up the term "Vichy France" in the dictionary.
The US is at war! Can you understand this? We are at war! You are a friend, an enemy, or not worth consideration. Are you friend, a foe, or a pesty gnat?
Gza said:Now I'm just appalled. Are you still bitter over the French having enough sense to not want to be involved in something as blatantly wrong as the invasion of Iraq? If a friend tries to stop you from driving drunk, do you verbally abuse them, and hate them for their sober perspective? I was shocked by the hatred people in the American media, as well as in people such as yourself at the French during the beginning of the war. Don't be angry at people with common sense, it just makes you look devoid of it.
humanino said:I am french. Thank you Gza. I would like to add that it is not easy for us either to keep in this attitude. We do feel guilty for not helping a friend at war. Usually, once the decision has been taken, everybody goes to war, even the ones that were against war before the begining. In the present case, not only did we think there were alternative solutions, we also think the situation has/will become impossible to handle. But today, I feel like Switzerland people : we are on the side of the field. We are not part of the "game" (sorry, just don't know a better word for this thought) ... feel useless.![]()
GENIERE said:Bitter [over the French]? No! Simply not worth considering, small change, irrelevant…
GENIERE said:Had the French joined the coalition I believe the war in Iraq would not have been necessary.
Gokul43201 said:A flip-flop ?
<all in jest !>
Wasn't the whole point of the "coalition of the willing" to get people on-side for the US invasion?GENIERE said:Had the French joined the coalition I believe the war in Iraq would not have been necessary.
Nice to see some truth! wish my country had, had the b! to say no!Gza said:Now I'm just appalled. Are you still bitter over the French having enough sense to not want to be involved in something as blatantly wrong as the invasion of Iraq? If a friend tries to stop you from driving drunk, do you verbally abuse them, and hate them for their sober perspective? I was shocked by the hatred people in the American media, as well as in people such as yourself at the French during the beginning of the war. Don't be angry at people with common sense, it just makes you look devoid of it.
Gza said:Now I'm just appalled. Are you still bitter over the French having enough sense to not want to be involved in something as blatantly wrong as the invasion of Iraq? If a friend tries to stop you from driving drunk, do you verbally abuse them, and hate them for their sober perspective? I was shocked by the hatred people in the American media, as well as in people such as yourself at the French during the beginning of the war. Don't be angry at people with common sense, it just makes you look devoid of it.
Mercator said:I cannot understand that anyone still supports the disaster in Iraq and blames the French for doing the right thing. Iraq was contained and the US invasion has done exactly what we in Europe expected: make a bigger mess. It has de facto helped the fundamentalist cause in a country that before the invasion was rather a buffer against muslim radicalism.
Mercator said:Islam clerics regard France as a country they can discuss with. This should ring a bell if you are looking for solutions for the Iraq disaster.
I, and the French for that matter HAVE been constructive from the beginning.
Somebody just did not listen. Which hatred are you talking about? No false accusations please. As for Iraq, you make me think about a kid who just wrecked his car during a trip which his friend did not want to join, and now he wants his friend to get him out of the mess.
Islam clerics regard France as a country they can discuss with.
JohnDubYa said:Okay, so the sanctions designed to force Saddam Hussein into obeying UN resolutions were killing tens of thousands every year, what was your country's STATED solution to ending the sanctions?
Except the kid was driving over to fix another mess that the friend was involved in creating. The UN resolutions and ensuing sanctions were imposed by France just as much as the US. The US and its true allies were willing to enforce the resolutions, which ultimately led to the end of the sanctions.
Translation: They think your country can be rolled.
Erm, exactly why can't it be both?Mercator said:So Islam clerics are automatically thugs for you? Nice departure point to start a discussion.
Tell me, what was the invasion in Iraq for, humanitarian purposes or the perceived threat? Because all Americans I discussed with switch between these options whenever convenient to save them in the discussion. It cannot be both, so take your pick before we discuss further.