Calculating Electric Field Strength at a Corner with No Charge

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the electric field strength at a corner of a square where no charge is present, while charges are located at the other three corners. The subject area is electrostatics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss breaking the electric field into vector components and using symmetry to determine direction. Questions arise about the appropriate form for expressing the final answer and the use of coordinate systems.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered hints regarding the use of symmetry and vector representation, while others are exploring the implications of these concepts without reaching a consensus on the final expression.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of using a coordinate system aligned with the direction of the electric field, and participants are considering how to express the electric field in unit vector form. The problem context includes a specific configuration of charges and the edge length of the square.

600burger
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
I'm encountering a problem with a practice test and previous homework problem in my electrostatics class.

Charges exist at three corners of a square as shown. Edge length = L. What is the Electric Field Strength (E) at the corner with no charge.


-3q
O------------O +2q
|
|
|
|
O-------------
+2q


so i break it into vectors using E= (k q)/(r^2) (Form of gauss) But i don't know what the final answer should look like...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember, the electric field is a vector - it has magnitude and direction!
 
Using symmetry of this problem,
you should be able to determine the direction,
and [almost by inspection] write down the algebraic answer.

Hint: if you can determine the direction (using symmetry), it is advantageous to use a coordinate system that has an axis along this direction [instead of the standard x- and y- axes]. The only components you'll need to consider are those along this axis.
 
Right a vector. So i would come out with an answer in unit vector form...like...



(x-component)i+(y-component)j. Or is there a simpiler way to write it?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K